“…In the early 1980s, the investigation of fragile fossil material with destructive methods was increasingly replaced by noninvasive computer tomography scanning (e.g., Conroy & Vannier, 1984;Hoffmann, Schultz, et al, 2014a), which provides a method to virtually reconstruct the internal anatomy of the bony labyrinth. As then, dozens of studies focus on aspects of phylogeny (e.g., Benoit et al, 2015;Lebrun, De León, Tafforeau, & Zollikofer, 2010;Maisey, 2001), physiology (e.g., Armstrong, Bloch, Houde, & Silcox, 2011;Coleman & Colbert, 2007;Kirk & Gosselin-Ildari, 2009;Manoussaki et al, 2008), ontogeny (Billet, de Muizon, et al, 2015;Costeur, Mennecart, Müller, & Schulz, 2017;Ekdale, 2010;Mennecart & Costeur, 2016;Sánchez-Villagra & Schmelzle, 2007), paleobiology (e.g., David et al, 2010;Neenan & Scheyer, 2012;Pfaff Nagel, et al, 2017;Spoor, Bajpai, Hussain, Kumar, & Thewissen, 2002) or functional morphology (e.g, Coutier, Hautier, Cornette, Amson, & Billet, 2017;Grohé, Tseng, Lebrun, Boistel, & Flynn, 2016;Pfaff, Czerny, Nagel, & Kriwet, 2017b;Pfaff, Martin, & Ruf, 2015;Ruf et al, 2016;Schellhorn, 2018a;Schutz, Jamniczky, Hallgrímsson, & Garland, 2014;Spoor et al, 2007) of the labyrinth organ in extant but also extinct taxa. Anatomical correlations between membranous and bony labyrinths seem underrepresented, and precise and detailed descriptions based on histological serial and thin sections are valuable (e.g., Maier, 2013;Maier & van den Heever, 2002;Schultz, Zeller, & Luo, 2017;Starck, 1995;Wever, 1978…”