2010
DOI: 10.3789/isqv22n2.2010.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Preservation in Capable Hands: Taking Control of Risk Assessment at the National Library of New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In regular submissions, the failure to use updated versions of the format could be explained by the kind of tools used by submitting authors. These tools generated old version, or even non-standard PDF documents (De Vorsey and McKinney, 2010). Universities are especially slow in updating authoring tools because they distribute software to their employees and often make no changes until the equipment is renewed, every four or five years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regular submissions, the failure to use updated versions of the format could be explained by the kind of tools used by submitting authors. These tools generated old version, or even non-standard PDF documents (De Vorsey and McKinney, 2010). Universities are especially slow in updating authoring tools because they distribute software to their employees and often make no changes until the equipment is renewed, every four or five years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Our initial considerations on risk analysis leaned heavily on institutional rendering capabilities (see DeVorsey and McKinney, 2009, 2010). That is, what can the Library render ‘correctly’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%