2014
DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2014.895507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Gatekeeping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Informativeness or simply the extent of relevant and timely information seems to be a strong motivation in predicting news sharing intention (Lee et al, 2011). According to Bro and Wallberg (2014) well-known persons/places (actors) and unusual facts (actions) seem also to be particularly important in understanding the news stories that audiences receive. Furthermore, social media users tend to prefer hard news and thus, opinion pieces over soft and general news.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Informativeness or simply the extent of relevant and timely information seems to be a strong motivation in predicting news sharing intention (Lee et al, 2011). According to Bro and Wallberg (2014) well-known persons/places (actors) and unusual facts (actions) seem also to be particularly important in understanding the news stories that audiences receive. Furthermore, social media users tend to prefer hard news and thus, opinion pieces over soft and general news.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, feedback to articles may depend on the appeal of the article rather than the topic per se (Bastos, 2014). Studying the news processes related to the use of Facebook, Bro and Wallberg (2014) revealed that two factors were particularly important in understanding the news stories that audiences receive: actors and actions. The former refers to well-known persons or places, while the latter pertains to something out of the ordinary.…”
Section: Social Network and Information Sharing Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As research has shown, these gatekeepers outside the newsrooms might have their own conceptions about what news to select and reject before they publish and distribute it by way of the new communicative infrastructures made possible by the internet. And recently researchers have looked into the values that determine what people outside the news media pass along by way of Twitter and Facebook (Bro and Wallberg 2014).…”
Section: Gatekeeping As a Process Of Gradual Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, many online community members are themselves produsers because they do not only passively consume materials posted by the networked gatekeeper, but they also actively produce comments and post images and videos that could provide insight into their values and beliefs (Bruns 2005(Bruns , 2008. Hence, the online community members who liked the Facebook page or are part of the Facebook group can also be regarded as decentralized networked gatekeepers (Bro and Wallberg 2014) unlike the Facebook page administrator who is a centralized gatekeeper (Shaw 2012). This is because they have selectively chosen to like, comment, and possibly share posts from the 'Arab Canadian' Facebook page though they are still limited in their comments to the particular topics suggested by the Facebook page administrator, as explained above.…”
Section: The Networked Gatekeeper and Decentralized Networked Gatekeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Bruns (2005Bruns ( , 2008 discusses the important role of ''produser'' netizens who function as gatewatchers as they are able to reproduce and filter information on SNS. In their study of Twitter and climate change protests, Segerberg and Bennett (2011) conclude that Twitter Streams ''embed and are embedded in various kinds of gatekeeping processes'' (197), while Bro and Wallberg (2014) stress that we are witnessing today a ''new generation of gatekeepers who use social media to produce, publish and distribute news stories'' (1). In this regard, Shaw (2012) refers to the centralized gatekeeping function in the sense that most of the online discussion is filtered and directed by gatekeepers who use a vertical type of communication that is mostly directed from top to bottom (Castells 2013, 71).…”
Section: Networked Gatekeeping On Social Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%