2017
DOI: 10.1017/nws.2017.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digit ratio (2D:4D) and social integration: An effect of prenatal sex hormones

Abstract: The position people occupy in their social and professional networks is related to their social status and has strong e↵ects on their access to social resources. While attainment of particular positions is driven by behavioral traits, many biological factors predispose individuals to certain behaviors and motivations. Prior work on exposure to fetal androgens (measured by second-to-fourth digit ratio, 2D:4D) shows that it correlates with behaviors and traits related to social status, which might make people mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, 2D:4D ratio is significantly associated with risk preferences over lotteries with real monetary incentives (Brañas-Garza et al, in press ). Recent research also showed that 2D:4D ratio correlates with social network centrality (Kovářík et al, 2017 ). In the current study, this association was abolished by testosterone treatment, possibly due to the enhancing effect of testosterone for status-goods among individuals with higher 2D:4D ratio (less masculine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, 2D:4D ratio is significantly associated with risk preferences over lotteries with real monetary incentives (Brañas-Garza et al, in press ). Recent research also showed that 2D:4D ratio correlates with social network centrality (Kovářík et al, 2017 ). In the current study, this association was abolished by testosterone treatment, possibly due to the enhancing effect of testosterone for status-goods among individuals with higher 2D:4D ratio (less masculine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Consequently, males tend to display lower 2D : 4D values than females [35,36]. Many studies, some using large samples, have analysed the association between 2D : 4D and diverse aspects of social involvement and interactions, including status seeking [37], social network positioning [38] and managerial ability [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in contrast to what one might expect due to the above reported sex differences, men with lower (more masculine) 2D:4D perform better in tasks that require networking or bonding. Accordingly, in men, lower 2D:4D has been related to more fairness (Millet and Dewitte, 2006), stronger cognitive reflection (Bosch-Domenèch et al, 2014), and higher betweenness centrality, i.e., they connect separated parts of the social structure (Kovářík et al, 2017). Moreover, males with lower 2D:4D show more courtship behavior in social interactions with women (Roney and Maestripieri, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%