2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10330-011-0731-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of CT scan diagnosis between minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with sufficient blood supply and clear cell renal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to differentiate them merely through CT [45]. Kimet al [6] compared various CT features of AML with minimal fat with those of size-matched RCCs and found that biphasic helical imaging may be useful in differentiating AML with minimal fat from RCC, with homogeneous tumor enhancement and prolonged enhancement pattern being the most valuable CT findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to differentiate them merely through CT [45]. Kimet al [6] compared various CT features of AML with minimal fat with those of size-matched RCCs and found that biphasic helical imaging may be useful in differentiating AML with minimal fat from RCC, with homogeneous tumor enhancement and prolonged enhancement pattern being the most valuable CT findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to clear cell renal carcinoma, AML with minimal fat also appears to exhibit abnormal enhancement with a “fast-in-and-fast-out” pattern during the early phase that is easily misdiagnosed as renal cancer. It is difficult to differentiate them merely through CT [45] . Kimet al [6] compared various CT features of AML with minimal fat with those of size-matched RCCs and found that biphasic helical imaging may be useful in differentiating AML with minimal fat from RCC, with homogeneous tumor enhancement and prolonged enhancement pattern being the most valuable CT findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%