Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus are common European ticks and vectors of various infections. Bartonella spp. is an aetiologic agent of vector-borne infections. Bartonella henselae transmission by cat fleas is now well established, and new potential vectors have recently been identified, including ticks and biting flies.The presence of Bartonella spp. was searched for in adult I. ricinus and D. reticulatus ticks collected from infested animals and vegetation.
M A T E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D SThe studies were performed on 447 ticks. Two hundred and forty-two adult I. ricinus ticks, including 165 removed from animals and 77 collected from vegetation, were tested. All but one of the studied 205 adult D. reticulatus ticks came from vegetation; one was removed from a cow. The ticks were collected in various parts of Poland: central (Warsaw and suburbs), eastern (Bialowieza forest, Biala Podlaska) and southern (Radomsko).All ticks collected from vegetation were unfed. Among 165 Ixodes ricinus ticks collected from animals, 60 were engorged, 48 partly engorged and 55 unfed.Tick samples were stored at )70°C until DNA isolation by Qiagen columns (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA was extracted from each tick in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol for tissue samples after homogenisation of the arthropod. All D. reticulatus ticks were crushed in Eppendorf tubes first and then DNA extraction was performed by boiling in 200 lL of 0.7 M NH 4 OH for 30 min.Molecular detection and identification of Bartonella spp. DNA was based on citrate synthase gene (gltA) fragment amplification, which enables identification of a few Bartonella species, as previously published [1]. PCR products were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The amplicons were sequenced with the ABI 377 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystem, Forester City, CA, USA). Database searches and sequence comparisons were performed with the BLAST search engines provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information.
R E S U L T SBartonella spp. DNA was detected in nine of 242 I. ricinus ticks, and in one of 205 D. reticulatus specimens. The frequency of Bartonella spp. in two studied species of ticks differed significantly. The majority of studied D. reticulates ticks were sampled from vegetation, whereas I. ricinus ticks were removed from both vegetation and animals.All of the nine I. ricinus ticks, in which Bartonella spp. DNA was detected, were removed from animals: eight from dogs and one from a cow. Four were engorged, four partly engorged and one unfed. The nucleotide sequence of the amplified fragments of the gltA gene from eight I. ricinus ticks were 99-100% homologous to sequences reported as B. henselae. In case of amplicon from one tick we got over 95% of homology with uncultured Bartonella sp. reported from I. tasmani and I. scapularis ticks.A D. reticulatus tick that was positive for Bartonella spp. DNA was collected from vegetation in Czerniakowski Park in Warsaw. A sequence of PCR-derived DNA fragmen...