1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199801)19:1<15::aid-job816>3.0.co;2-c
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment: a test of March and Simon's model
Abstract: SummaryRecent theory regarding the nature of organizational commitment suggests that viewing it as comprised of two dimensions, value commitment and continuance commitment, is of theoretical and practical value. This ®eld study found the dierential antecedents of these two commitment dimensions to be consistent with the March and Simon (1958) framework using the two-dimensional organizational commitment questionnaire from Mayer and Schoorman (1992). Organizational tenure, retirement bene®ts, education, and age…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
145
7
7
5
Citation Types
6
72
2
7
Year Published
1999
2024
Publication Types
Select...
140
11
6
1
Relationship
0
158
Authors
Journals
Cited by 158 publications
(87 citation statements)
References 46 publications
6
72
2
7
“…We also revealed that CC is positively related to the educational level: secondary school leavers demonstrated the lowest level of CC, while MA/MBA holders scored the highest level in this commitment component. These results contrast with those obtained in Western contexts (Mayer and Schoorman, 1998; Meyer et al , 2002). It is worth noting that earlier findings were interpreted through the lens of the individualistic value orientation that is preponderant in the West.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We also revealed that CC is positively related to the educational level: secondary school leavers demonstrated the lowest level of CC, while MA/MBA holders scored the highest level in this commitment component. These results contrast with those obtained in Western contexts (Mayer and Schoorman, 1998; Meyer et al , 2002). It is worth noting that earlier findings were interpreted through the lens of the individualistic value orientation that is preponderant in the West.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“……”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“……”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
