2017
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential responses of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and right posterior superior temporal sulcus to spontaneous mentalizing

Abstract: Previous research suggests a role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in metacognitive representation of social information, while the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) has been linked to social perception. This study targeted these functional roles in the context of spontaneous mentalizing. An animated shapes task was presented to 46 subjects during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Stimuli consisted of video clips depicting animated shapes whose movement patterns prompt spontaneou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atypical gaze analysis also seems to be related to activation differences observed in functional MRI at the level of the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), as well as the right anterior insula and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Pitskel et al 2011). At the same time, when analysing scenes involving animated geometric shapes whose movements evoke intentions and social interactions, the functional network analyses revealed a strong coupling between the visual areas of the lateral occipital cortex and the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) (Moessnang et al 2017). In addition to primary sensory and motor regions, we also observed an increase in GWPC in parts of STS and TPJ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Atypical gaze analysis also seems to be related to activation differences observed in functional MRI at the level of the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), as well as the right anterior insula and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Pitskel et al 2011). At the same time, when analysing scenes involving animated geometric shapes whose movements evoke intentions and social interactions, the functional network analyses revealed a strong coupling between the visual areas of the lateral occipital cortex and the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS) (Moessnang et al 2017). In addition to primary sensory and motor regions, we also observed an increase in GWPC in parts of STS and TPJ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Increasing values of the parametric modulator (i.e., 1, 2, and 3) coded for increasing mentalizing demands in random, goal-directed, and ToM conditions, respectively. This approach deviates from previous ASD studies where the ToM condition was compared to the low-level baseline condition (i.e., random movement) while ignoring the goal-directed condition [7,12,13,28,29,45,46]. The current approach comes with the advantage that it draws on all available data, thereby maximizing statistical power and aligning with the assumption of a gradual increase of mentalizing demands across conditions [26].…”
Section: Subject-level Activation Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The animated shapes task was chosen as one of four neurocognitive paradigms in this large study, given the promising findings in earlier reports that suggest high construct validity for on-line mentalizing deficits in ASD [7,26,27], and due to its good applicability across age ranges and intellectual abilities. Here, we used an adapted version of the task [27] that was recently shown to have reproducible effects on functional activation [28] and to be sensitive for autism-related traits [29]. Functional responses were comprehensively assessed as changes in brain activation and related to age and clinical status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in conjunction with the AON, it forms a core circuit for imitation (Iacoboni and Dapretto, 2006;Molenberghs et al, 2010). It supports processing of complex social information and is especially critical for processing of goal-directed actions such as gestures (Allison et al, 2000;Villarreal et al, 2008;Arfeller et al, 2013;Moessnang et al, 2017). Abnormalities in this region have been implicated in ASD: neuroimaging studies provide evidence of atypical patterns of activity during tasks involving social cognition, including those involving BM, as well as abnormal structural integrity (Zilbovicius et al, 2006;Pelphrey and Carter, 2008;Williams, 2008;Kaiser et al, 2010;Patriquin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%