2021
DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2021.1882386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential biocontrol efficacy of the parasitoid waspCampoletis sonorensison the Fall ArmywormSpodoptera frugiperdafeeding on landrace and hybrid maize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological control, particularly using parasitoids as primary agents, combined with other control measures, has been shown to reduce costs, minimize agricultural nonpoint source pollution, and achieve long-term and effective control [23]. Several studies demonstrated that parasitic wasps can limit the population growth of S. frugiperda to some extent [24,25]. The parasitoid species Cotesia ruficrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is an endoparasitic wasp that can parasitize the larvae of several pests in Noctuidae and Pyralidae families [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological control, particularly using parasitoids as primary agents, combined with other control measures, has been shown to reduce costs, minimize agricultural nonpoint source pollution, and achieve long-term and effective control [23]. Several studies demonstrated that parasitic wasps can limit the population growth of S. frugiperda to some extent [24,25]. The parasitoid species Cotesia ruficrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is an endoparasitic wasp that can parasitize the larvae of several pests in Noctuidae and Pyralidae families [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions with other insects, such as competing herbivores and natural enemies, affect fall armyworm performance (Costa et al, 2022). In its native region, fall armyworm is a host to a large variety of parasitoid wasps and flies (von Mérey et al, 2012; Barreto‐Barriga et al, 2021; Traine et al, 2021), some of which are commercially available (Vargas et al, 2021). The species is also frequently attacked by predators, fungi, viruses, and entomopathogenic nemathodes (Molina‐Ochoa et al, 2003; Fallet et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type and size of a study arena used to assess predation can influence the results obtained from the experiments, with predation rates usually decreasing from small, closed containers to open containers to plants within cages (Macfadyen et al 2015). The placement of prey can influence predation results in artificial arenas, because predator searching behavior and efficiency may change on different plant parts and species (Coll et al 1997;Castellanos et al 2010;Barreto-Barriga et al 2021). Food deprivation also can influence rates of predatory attacks, and in ambush predators the attack distance increases with hunger (Wallin & Ekbom 1994;Taylor & Schmidt 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%