2019
DOI: 10.1590/0370-44672019720029 View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
|

Abstract: Upon reading the negative opinion of the CNPq Review Committee, referring to the request for editorial support made by REM, I have come to the conclusion that some points elaborated by it showed the committee's lack of knowledge about the magazine. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq has been funding the magazine for years, regardless of the publisher's curriculum, who in the case of REM is me, and I work full time as its administrator and believe I have done an excellent job to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance
Select...
0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals