2019
DOI: 10.1590/0101-7438.2019.039.02.0245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Types of Return to Scale in Dea

Abstract: The format of the efficient frontier is an important measure of technical efficiency; additionally, it determines the type of return to scale verified by the model. The classical Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, CCR (Charnes et al., 1978), assumes constant returns to scale; conversely, the BCC (Banker et al., 1984) model presents a concave downward efficient frontier that presumes variable returns to scale. This study examines how different returns to scale can be revealed in DEA, considering the possibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggestions for future studies, we propose the analysis of the multiple optimal weights for the relational model and its representations in the graph. Besides that, we propose extending the model presented for different types of return to scale (Benicio and Soares de Mello, 2019) and other Network DEA models, as the additive model (Chen et al, 2009), the relational model (Kao, 2009), multi-stage processes (Despotis et al, 2016b;Zhang et al, 2019;Guo et al, 2017) and other models (Tone and Tsutsui, 2009;Guo and Zhu, 2017;Wang et al, 2019). Another suggestion for future studies is to verify how to determine the target for inefficient DMUs at the efficient frontier, for that, it can be applied the method proposed in Chen et al ( 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggestions for future studies, we propose the analysis of the multiple optimal weights for the relational model and its representations in the graph. Besides that, we propose extending the model presented for different types of return to scale (Benicio and Soares de Mello, 2019) and other Network DEA models, as the additive model (Chen et al, 2009), the relational model (Kao, 2009), multi-stage processes (Despotis et al, 2016b;Zhang et al, 2019;Guo et al, 2017) and other models (Tone and Tsutsui, 2009;Guo and Zhu, 2017;Wang et al, 2019). Another suggestion for future studies is to verify how to determine the target for inefficient DMUs at the efficient frontier, for that, it can be applied the method proposed in Chen et al ( 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%