2016
DOI: 10.1080/1828051x.2016.1139478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in intramuscular fatty acid profiles amongBos indicusand crossbredBos taurus × Bos indicusbulls finished on pasture or with concentrate feed in Brazil

Abstract: Bos indicus (n ¼ 67) and crossbred Bos taurus  Bos indicus (n ¼ 67) bulls were finished in extensive or intensive conditions to evaluate the effect of genetic differences and finishing system on the fatty acid (FA) composition of intramuscular fat. Finishing system had a more pronounced effect on FA profiles than the genetic group, but the two factors often interacted for both individual and groups of FA. When compared with animals finished intensively, those finished on pasture produced meat with higher conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, genotype had a limited effect on FA profile. Bressan et al (2016) showed higher level of CLA and MUFA in the intramuscular fat of beef of Bos indicus than that of crossbred Bos taurus  Bos indicus bulls, however, in agreement with the results of the present study, also these authors highlighted a minor effect of crossing on FA of beef. Gama et al (2013) reported a low impact of heterosis on FA profile of beef from bulls fed with pasture-based diets.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Overall, genotype had a limited effect on FA profile. Bressan et al (2016) showed higher level of CLA and MUFA in the intramuscular fat of beef of Bos indicus than that of crossbred Bos taurus  Bos indicus bulls, however, in agreement with the results of the present study, also these authors highlighted a minor effect of crossing on FA of beef. Gama et al (2013) reported a low impact of heterosis on FA profile of beef from bulls fed with pasture-based diets.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to PINHO et al (2011), in animals finished on pasture, the lipid fraction is characterized for having larger quantities of polyunsaturated fatty acids. BRESSAN et al (2016) observed 47.29% SFA, 41.10% MUFA, and 10.82%…”
Section: Centesimal Composition -----------Nutritional Plan 1 -------mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, the ability to discriminate meats according to genetic group was not as reliable as it was for finishing system, and it was only feasible with good accuracy when FA profiles and physicochemical properties were combined in the discriminant function, where more than 95% of the samples could be correctly allocated to genetic group. The factors with higher discriminating ability in this case were microbial FA, n-3 FA, 17:0, 18:0 and cholesterol, largely reflecting the differences among taurus and indicus cattle in rumen biohydrogenation [ 12 , 32 ]. These results further indicate that, although tenderness is generally assumed to be, on average, less desirable in B. indicus meat [ 8 , 9 ], the variability observed among meat samples from different animals is quite large, such that the ability to discriminate meats according to their genetic group of origin is not feasible based on physicochemical properties alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%