2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Fear of Isolation as an explanation of Cultural Differences: Evidence from memory and reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(59 reference statements)
9
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inducing a high level of FOI lead participants to attend more to relationships between context and focal objects and resulted in participants being more likely to incorrectly recognize an old animal when it appeared with a new background than with an old background. Interestingly, using identical materials used by Masuda and Nisbett (2001) and Peng and Nisbett (1999), Kim and Markman (2006) found that following the FOI manipulation, participants in the high FOI group were more likely to rely on context (as opposed to target) in a recognition memory task. Thus, US American participants were more likely to recognize an animal when it appeared with the original background than when it appeared with a new background following the FOI manipulation.…”
Section: Demonstrating Differences Vs Causally Understanding Differementioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Inducing a high level of FOI lead participants to attend more to relationships between context and focal objects and resulted in participants being more likely to incorrectly recognize an old animal when it appeared with a new background than with an old background. Interestingly, using identical materials used by Masuda and Nisbett (2001) and Peng and Nisbett (1999), Kim and Markman (2006) found that following the FOI manipulation, participants in the high FOI group were more likely to rely on context (as opposed to target) in a recognition memory task. Thus, US American participants were more likely to recognize an animal when it appeared with the original background than when it appeared with a new background following the FOI manipulation.…”
Section: Demonstrating Differences Vs Causally Understanding Differementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this paper, we begin by discussing two separate approaches to cross-cultural research, one that focuses on individualism vs. collectivism (e.g., Nisbett et al 2001) and another that focuses on chronic social/environmental factors (e.g., Kim and Markman 2006;Miyamoto et al 2006). Then, we discuss the possibility of a within-Western culture difference between Italian and US American reasoning style and that the cause of this difference is, in part, due to within-cultural chronic differences in Fear of Isolation (FOI).…”
Section: Intercultural Differences In Reasoning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations