2019
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Antigenic Structure of Inactivated Polio Vaccines Made From Sabin Live-Attenuated and Wild-Type Poliovirus Strains: Impact on Vaccine Potency Assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…sIPV-induced antibodies have been shown to be cross-reactive against almost all poliovirus strains tested – Sabin, Salk, cVDPV and wild-type – the exception being an isolate excreted from an immunodeficient individual (iVDPV) [34] . In a collaborative study to establish standards for sIPV there were some small variations in antigen-specificity between Sabin and other polioviruses used by different manufacturers, including those used by Takeda [35] . However, these variations were too small to account for the low responses we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sIPV-induced antibodies have been shown to be cross-reactive against almost all poliovirus strains tested – Sabin, Salk, cVDPV and wild-type – the exception being an isolate excreted from an immunodeficient individual (iVDPV) [34] . In a collaborative study to establish standards for sIPV there were some small variations in antigen-specificity between Sabin and other polioviruses used by different manufacturers, including those used by Takeda [35] . However, these variations were too small to account for the low responses we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be partially explained by the yet to be cleared correlation between in vitro and in vivo potency assays in case of sIPV products. Such correlation has been long established and proved for conventional Salk IPV vaccines [38]. Also, previous studies showed that in some cases the loss of the D-antigen did not impact significantly on the in vivo potency of sIPV vaccine [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Previous studies showed antigenic differences between traditional Salk-IPV and IPV made from Sabin strains [37]. These studies recommended the formulation of a new international reference standard to measure the D-antigen content and assess the potency of the s-IPV products [38]. For this reason; four identical trivalent vaccine preparations were formulated; the only difference between them is the inactivating agent and these preparations were tested for their safety and immunogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 After being stored at −20°C overnight, the D-antigen contents of 17/234 candidate samples were decreased by 3.5% to 7.6% and were decreased by 29.9% to 60.2% after being stored at −20°C for 2 weeks. 17,18 These results indicate that the stability of the sIPV at freezing is similar to that of the wIPV, featuring the same sensitivity of inactivated polio characteristics with a significant decrease in D-antigens. 12 As observed with the potency of the wIPV, which remained qualified after exposure at −20°C for ≤7 days, 12 sIPVs exposed to freezing conditions at −20°C for 1 day or 1 week exhibited no significant reduction in immunogenicity in the in vivo analysis in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%