1989
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90305-5
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Differences between Kallawaya-Andean and Greek-European humoral theory

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
22
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
2
0
0

Year Published

Range
1996
1996
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
14
7
2

Relationship

0
23

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 23 publications

(2 citation statements)
references

References 12 publications

0
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…While scholars have long pointed to the paucity of university-trained physicians in colonial Latin America, until recently histories of the multiplicity of healers who drew on healing traditions of African, Indigenous, and Iberian origin have been difficult to come by. Research on indigenous and African healing systems and practices was originally the domain of anthropologists (Aguirre-Beltran, 1963;Bastien, 1987Bastien, , 1989López-Austin & Alfredo, 1975Orellana, 1987;Ortiz de Montellano, 1990;Silverblatt, 1983;Voeks, 1993Voeks, , 1997Viesca-Treviño, 1986. Meanwhile, studies of curanderos and the politics of healing initially focused on their "repression" at the hands of regulatory bodies, especially the Inquisition, observing its relative tolerance towards healing practices deemed superstitious (Quezada, 1989(Quezada, , 1991Griffiths, 1999).…”
Section: A Plurality Of Cures Healers and Knowledges
mentioning
confidence: 99%