2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences and similaritites between corporate governance principles in Islamic banks and Conventional banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although economic calculation and the profit concerns of the IBs are allocated to the BoD, the appreciation of the licit character of this profit is allocated to the SSB [10]. Thus, SSBs play an important role in mitigating agency problems by acting as an additional monitoring mechanism [3,33,34]. SSBs offer an extra possible reduction in agency costs for IBs through organizational moral accountability constraints and shaping managerial behavior [3,34].…”
Section: Shari'ah Supervision and Bank Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although economic calculation and the profit concerns of the IBs are allocated to the BoD, the appreciation of the licit character of this profit is allocated to the SSB [10]. Thus, SSBs play an important role in mitigating agency problems by acting as an additional monitoring mechanism [3,33,34]. SSBs offer an extra possible reduction in agency costs for IBs through organizational moral accountability constraints and shaping managerial behavior [3,34].…”
Section: Shari'ah Supervision and Bank Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It refers to a set of internal control mechanisms, such as board structure (i.e., the characteristics of the board of directors, executives vs. non-executive, etc. ), leadership structure, and the ownership structure of the firm (i.e., family, managerial, or block-holder ownership), and external control mechanisms (i.e., changes in stock price, employment market for managers, and market for corporate control) whose aim is to protect the interest of public shareholders (Engel et al, 2002;Chahine, 2007;Kusumaningtias et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017;Sanchez-Marin et al, 2017;Shibani and De Fuentes, 2017;Yeh, 2017;Yu et al, 2017). These mechanisms allow fund providers to guarantee the return of their financial investments (Shleifer and Vishny, 1997;Chahine, 2007).…”
Section: Elements Of Corporate Governance Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa peneliti (Diallo, 2017;Shibani & Fuentes, 2017;Wang & Sarkis, 2017) Yang, Jiao, & Buckland (2017). Keduanya meneliti deter-minan GCG dan timeliness.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanmentioning
confidence: 99%