2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102003000400020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diferença no tamanho de cascas de ovos de colônias de Panstrongylus megistus

Abstract: Panstrongylus megistus é considerado um dos principais vetores da doença de Chagas, devido à sua alta susceptibilidade ao Trypanosoma cruzi, ampla distribuição geográfica e adaptação a vários habitats e hospedeiros. Por essa razão, pode ser encontrado no domicílio e peridomicílio no estado da Bahia, no ambiente silvestre ou domiciliado na região Sudeste, predominantemente silvestre no Sul do País (Barbosa et al 2,3 1999, 2001 Embora na literatura consultada sejam encontradas publicações mostrando diferenças … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are morphological and genetic differences among the two species here studied which led to their recognition as separate species [62]; nevertheless, these differences were previously considered not to warrant them separation at the species level by Abad-Fanch [18]. The few morphological differences identified may be a consequence of recent divergence, however, the current SNP analysis shows that 5,562 (40.6%) of the SNPs identified were fixed between the species (Fig 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are morphological and genetic differences among the two species here studied which led to their recognition as separate species [62]; nevertheless, these differences were previously considered not to warrant them separation at the species level by Abad-Fanch [18]. The few morphological differences identified may be a consequence of recent divergence, however, the current SNP analysis shows that 5,562 (40.6%) of the SNPs identified were fixed between the species (Fig 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen males and 15 females were measured together with 15 eggshells (Naegele et al 2003;Rosa et al 2003). The characters measured were: total length of the triatomines (TL), length of the head (HL), length of the antenna segments (A1, A2, A3, and A4) and rostrum segments (R1, R2, and R3), inner distance between eyes (IE), anteocular (AO) and post-ocular distances (PO), diameter of the eye (DE), maximum abdomen (MWA) and thorax widths (MWT), eggshell area, length, width, and diameter of the opercular aperture (Lent and Wigodzinsky 1979;Dujardin et al 1999a;Rosa et al 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barata (1981) used both OM and SEM to enable detailed descriptions of the macroscopic and exochorial characteristics of 10 species from the genus Rhodnius (Stål, 1859) and created a key for classifying species by egg morphology. Various authors (Rosa et al 2000(Rosa et al , 2003 have since adopted this approach. After Barata (1981), many species have been described or re-described on the basis of egg morphology (Sandoval et al 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%