2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary preferences in the context of intra-couple dynamics: Relationship types within the German NutriAct family cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The German version of the DEBQ [ 12 ] measures three dimensions of eating style with 30 items: the degree of restrained, emotional, and external eating. Education was assessed according to the internationally comparable CASMIN-index [ 24 ] as previously reported for the NFS cohort [ 25 ]. The SF-8 measures the eight health profile dimensions of the SF-36 [ 26 ] in a comparatively short test using one item per dimension: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The German version of the DEBQ [ 12 ] measures three dimensions of eating style with 30 items: the degree of restrained, emotional, and external eating. Education was assessed according to the internationally comparable CASMIN-index [ 24 ] as previously reported for the NFS cohort [ 25 ]. The SF-8 measures the eight health profile dimensions of the SF-36 [ 26 ] in a comparatively short test using one item per dimension: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, participants will be relatively experienced in terms of participating in research studies and potentially biased towards a generally higher interest in nutrition-related topics. In addition, the NFS participant pool shows a comparably high level of education [ 45 ], which might further limit the representativeness of the sample. As the enrollment in the present study depends on the agreement and cooperation of both partners, there might also occur a selection bias towards functional relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, one family member may influence household participation in green practices such as waste management, which requires a certain degree of co-action between household members [56]. Only a few studies have analyzed the ethical behavior of the consumer by considering the topic at the couple level or the family level [19,20]. Grønhøj [18] studied decision making about ecological practices within the family.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Influence Within Family In Relation To Ethical C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They often involve both spouses and even sometimes the children, who are increasingly involved in this family decision making process because of their awareness of ethical issues in their daily lives. Only a few studies have considered the dynamics of influence within couples regarding ethical purchase decisions [18][19][20]. Compared to an individual decision, a joint decision often implies concessions from one partner when the points of view on the best product to choose or the purchase criteria differ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%