1989
DOI: 10.2307/1541980
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Diel Variation in Prey Capture Behavior by the Corallimorpharian Discosoma sanctithomae: Mechanical and Chemical Activation of Feeding

Abstract: The feeding biology of corallimorpharians is poorly understood. This paper describes an envelopment method of prey capture by a Caribbean species, Discosoma (= Rhodactis) sanctithomae, and further examines the stimuli that elicit envelopment and subsequent ingestion of prey. The corallimorpharians exhibited a diel pattern of expansion and contraction of the oral disc margin and tentacles. This was correlated with the density of zooxanthellae in these tissues. The tentacles expanded during the day to expose abu… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
9
4
3
0

Citation Types

2
8
1
1

Year Published

Range
1991
1991
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
11
2
1

Relationship

0
14

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 14 publications

(12 citation statements)
references

References 19 publications

2
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…At partial LAIW-temperature and full LAIW conditions, food presence did not elicit polyp expansion, apart from a few exceptions, notably among the W colonies (supplementary material Figs S4, S5). These results confirm the hypothesis that the mechanical and chemical cues triggering polyp expansion in the presence of food particles (McFarlane, 1978;Elliott and Cook, 1989) are superseded by the behavioral reaction in response to full LAIW conditions. Table 1 for seawater quality data).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The presence of food exerted a strong effect over the expansion/contraction behavior of the polyps of P. lutea, but this effect was not always positive, as opposed to previous studies (Elliott and Cook, 1989;Levy et al, 2001). In some cases, food availability caused polyps to retract rather than expand their tentacles.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation