“…Although these groups are similar in that they exert virtually no electrostatic field influence (σ F ≈ 0; Table ) they differ markedly with respect to their double hyperconjugative interaction mode as revealed by the 19 F SCS of 14 and 23 (Tables and , respectively). Model system reactivity studies (see later) under conditions of high electron demand have confirmed and heightened this distinction. 63i,,, Note, however, that the selectivities exerted by these groups (Tables and ) are feeble and, moreover, the observed selectivities are in accord with expectations based purely on electrostatic grounds. Thus, the overall picture portrayed by the results (Tables and ), namely, the unimportance of transition-state hyperconjugation governing diastereofacial selectivity in the nucleophilic additions of 1 (Y = O), is strongly reinforced.…”