Dialectics of Resilience: A Multi–Level Analysis of a Telehealth Innovation

Abstract

Resilience is commonly portrayed as a positive capability that allows individuals, groups, and organizations to thrive in dynamic contexts.This paper questions this oversimplified view based on a dialectical analysis of a telehealth innovation within a network of collaborating hospitals. We analyze the major contradictions that characterize the adoption of the innovation. First, we analyze contradictions between individuals and groups within each adopting organization. Second, we analyze contradictions between the adopting organizations. This multi-level analysis leads to a deeper understanding of resilience as a dialectical process. The analysis of the case shows that, although the participating individuals, groups, and organizations demonstrated apparent resilience in adopting the telehealth innovation, the innovation remained in a fragile state, where it was unclear whether it would continue to diffuse, stabilize as-is, or slowly deteriorate. Hence, while resilience facilitated swift and successful adoption, it also created tensions that endangered further diffusion and the long-term sustainability of the telehealth innovation. We suggest that understanding the future success of the innovation would be facilitated to a large extent by a dialectical analysis of the involved contradictions.

Indicators of Organizational Resilience in Critical Sociotechnical Systems: A Qualitative Study for the Refinery Complex

“…Flexibility allows organizations to adapt to changes, according to their resources and makes organizations be more responsive to changes. Flexibility is a basic requirement and empowers organizations to manage their threats properly (38).…”

Stakeholder Contradictions in Early Stages of eHealth Efforts

“…Cho, Mathiassen and Robey [6] continue the line of research related to telehealth innovation by investigating the relationship between adoption of technology and organizational resilience with use of dialectic process theory. For understanding the future success of eHealth innovation in a large extent, Cho et al [6] suggest a dialectical analysis of the involved contradictions.…”

A communicative-tension model of change-induced collective voluntary turnover in IT

“…More specifically, the importance of social processes where dialectics are central to social interaction, have provided useful insights in strategic organizational change (Benson, 1977;de Rond and Bouchikhi, 2004;Mason, 1969;Jay, 2013), corporate social responsibility (Dhanesh, 2015), change management (Ford and Ford, 1994;Kovoor-Misra, 2009), and IT studies (Cho et al, 2007;Robey and Holmstrom, 2001;Sabherwal and Newman, 2003).…”