2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0268-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET, MRI, and Plain Film Radiography (PFR) for the Diagnosis of Osteomyelitis in the Diabetic Foot

Abstract: FDG-PET is a highly specific imaging modality for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot and, therefore, should be considered to be a useful complimentary imaging modality with MRI. In the setting where MRI is contraindicated, the high sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET justifies its use after a negative or inconclusive PFR to aid an accurate diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
92
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18 F-FDG accumulates in inflammatory cells because these, like malignant cells, metabolize glucose as a source of energy (16). With the routine 18 F-FDG PET protocols, it is not possible to reliably distinguish infection from inflammation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18 F-FDG accumulates in inflammatory cells because these, like malignant cells, metabolize glucose as a source of energy (16). With the routine 18 F-FDG PET protocols, it is not possible to reliably distinguish infection from inflammation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the routine 18 F-FDG PET protocols, it is not possible to reliably distinguish infection from inflammation. No acquisition protocols for 18 F-FDG PET in the diabetic foot have yet been validated, and only a few comparison studies between 18 F-FDG PET and WBC scintigraphy are available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MRI soundly assessed osteomyelitis in 20 of 22 patients and properly excluded it in 56 of 72 patients, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 91, 78, 56, 97, and 81%, respectively. PFR also had sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 63, 87, 60, 88, and 81%, respectively [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are conflicting results regarding radiolabeled ciprofloxacin against microorganisms responsible for infection [24,25]. Although positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) may be promising for imaging bone infections [26][27][28], the impact of elevated serum glucose levels, present mainly in diabetic patients, on PET sensitivity is a controversial issue [29]. In addition, its high charge and limited accessibility hinder its widespread use in the detection of osteomyelitis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%