1998
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic impact of four postprocessing techniques in evaluating contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
27
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are comparable to those of Hany et al (11) which were 96%, 91% and 92% for MIP, regarding sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy in detection of renal artery stenosis while for MPR they were 96%, 97% and 96%. In spite of the short post-processing times for MIP images, they are handicapped by projection -related limitations in a manner identical to conventional catheter angiogram.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results are comparable to those of Hany et al (11) which were 96%, 91% and 92% for MIP, regarding sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy in detection of renal artery stenosis while for MPR they were 96%, 97% and 96%. In spite of the short post-processing times for MIP images, they are handicapped by projection -related limitations in a manner identical to conventional catheter angiogram.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…DSA. Future refinements in MR postprocessing technique will further improve this ability [30]. This may be even more problematic for visual assessment (as used in this study) compared with calliper measurement, a factor that may be amplified in a multicentre study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Third-generation techniques that allow 3D volume acquisitions in a single breath-hold, in combination with real-time interactive slice positioning, appear very promising. Real-time slice positioning, and higher-resolution acquisition schemes, such as spiral MRA, can further improve and facilitate the use of these coronary MRA techniques (85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94)(95)(96) (Figs. 7 and 8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%