2020
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DH82 Canine and RAW264.7 Murine Macrophage Cell Lines Display Distinct Activation Profiles Upon Interaction With Leishmania infantum and Leishmania amazonensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the DH82 canine macrophage cell line has primarily been utilized as a model of viral and protozoan infection [23][24][25], such as for the study of canine distemper and its oncolytic potential [55][56][57]. Although studies have described the expression of functional P2 receptors in human or rodent macrophages and macrophage cell lines [8,10,11,34], studies directly investigating P2 receptors in canine macrophages have been absent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, the DH82 canine macrophage cell line has primarily been utilized as a model of viral and protozoan infection [23][24][25], such as for the study of canine distemper and its oncolytic potential [55][56][57]. Although studies have described the expression of functional P2 receptors in human or rodent macrophages and macrophage cell lines [8,10,11,34], studies directly investigating P2 receptors in canine macrophages have been absent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have demonstrated that DH82 cells express a number of macrophage markers, such as CD11c and CD18 [ 21 ], and can secrete tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 similar to that observed in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated canine monocytes [ 22 ]. Despite its use as an in vitro model of viral and protozoan infection [ 23 , 24 , 25 ], knowledge regarding purinergic signalling in DH82 cells is limited to a single report describing ATP- and adenosine-induced cytokine release [ 26 ]. Although this study did not investigate any purinergic receptor per se, DH82 cells represent a possible model to study endogenous P2 receptors in canine macrophages for a number of reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cofilin is one of the actin-binding proteins demonstrated to play roles in the actin cytoskeletal remodelling, migration directionality and phagosome formation of macrophages [54,55]. Interestingly, in the current study, we showed that the rTc-MUC-1 interacts with the actin binding protein CFL1 of the macrophage-like Abelson leukaemia virus-transformed cell line derived from BALB/c mice (RAW264.7) that has been commonly used to explore parasite-host interactions [56][57][58]. CFL1 was also predicted to associate with other proteins that were identified in the pull-down assay, including actin, cyclase associated actin cytoskeleton regulatory protein, coronin actin binding protein, lymphocyte cytosolic protein and Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha, which are known to play roles in the myosin contraction and cofilin-mediated disassembly during macrophage migration [54,55].…”
Section: Plos Neglected Tropical Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In fact, a limited number of works have been conducted using the canine macrophage-like cell line DH82 as a cell model to study Leishmania infection. The DH82 cells can be considered an M2 subtype macrophage model for leishmaniasis [ 22 ], however, these cells were less permissive to L. infantum infection and showed a lower number of amastigotes per macrophages compared to mouse macrophages or human U937 cell line [ 23 ]. This was evident also in the present work, since the infection indexes were rather low compared to human or murine models used in our previous publications, where infection indexes were approximately 150–600 [ 11 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy, the ER stress markers induction with tunicamycin resulted mild compared to U937, THP1 or murine macrophages (in which for example, sXBP1 was 20–100 fold upregulated) [ 11 , 16 ]. In the same way, Nadaes et al showed general low responsiveness in DH82 stimulated by LPS compared with RAW264.7 cells in terms of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) production, underling a different activation mechanism in this cell line [ 22 ]. A significant induction of ER stress expression markers -including sXBP1 was observed after 48 h post-infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%