2011
DOI: 10.4314/ijbcs.v5i1.68092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Développement et validation d’une méthode quantitative de dosage par Chromatographie Liquide à Haute Performance Ultra-violet (CLHP-UV) de l’artémisinine dans <i>Artemisia annua</i> cultivé au Bénin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recovery rate found in this study was 98% (with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.99). This result corroborates a study [24] that separated amygdalin within 15 mn in almond seeds and food products in the UK. The result is similar to that of [25], who worked on artemisinin grown in Benin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recovery rate found in this study was 98% (with a correlation coefficient of R = 0.99). This result corroborates a study [24] that separated amygdalin within 15 mn in almond seeds and food products in the UK. The result is similar to that of [25], who worked on artemisinin grown in Benin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While, among cassava derivatives, the Agbeli derivative was more concentrated in amygdalin with a range of 401.56 µg/10 g. These contents are lower than the 141.000 µg 10 g −1 and 155.000 µg 10 g −1 obtained, respectively, with almond seeds and Mongolian almonds reported in the studies of [26] in China. High levels were also received with green plum, apricot, black plum, peach, red cherry, and black cherry, as reported by [24] (17.5 mg g −1 , 14.4 mg g −1 , 10 mg g −1 , 6.8 mg g −1 , 3.9 mg g −1 and 2.7 mg g −1 , respectively). The differences observed with these results can be explained by variations in the plant species studied, climatic and environmental factors, and the soil types exploited to grow these plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Quant à la limite de détection (LD), elle correspond à la plus petite quantité de la substance considérée qui peut être détectée dans un échantillon, sans forcément pouvoir être quantifiée de façon exacte (ICH, 2005). Dans notre étude, la LQ et la LD ont été déterminées à travers les formules suivantes : LQ = 10 s/a et LD = 3 s/a avec s étant l'écarttype de la droite d'étalonnage et a étant la pente de cette droite (Ganse et al, 2011).…”
Section: Limite De Quantification Et Limite De Détectionunclassified