2010
DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v6i1.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developmental dyslexics and unimpaired children’s reading and memory for words in a transparent orthography

Abstract: Word reading and short-term memory performance of forty two developmental dyslexics (mean age 10.1 years, SD = .7) and thirty three unimpaired reading age matched (mean age of 8.5, SD = .5) and thirty six unimpaired chronological age matched children (mean age of 10.6, SD = .7) was investigated in transparent Polish orthography. Fifty of the children were instructed that they were expected to recall the list of (12 high frequency mainly concrete) words after reading them aloud (Condition A), whilst others had … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to attain model identification, the model was adjusted by replacing the path from situational variables to perceived relationship closeness and support, to including be a direct path from situational variables to loneliness. Employment status was also removed from the model based on previous research findings and the non-significant one way ANOVA (Neto, 2014). While the model was now recursive, the fit was still poor, w 2 /df ¼ 3.64, w 2 (102) ¼ 371.1; CFI ¼ .824; RMSEA ¼ .091; 90% CI: .081, .101.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to attain model identification, the model was adjusted by replacing the path from situational variables to perceived relationship closeness and support, to including be a direct path from situational variables to loneliness. Employment status was also removed from the model based on previous research findings and the non-significant one way ANOVA (Neto, 2014). While the model was now recursive, the fit was still poor, w 2 /df ¼ 3.64, w 2 (102) ¼ 371.1; CFI ¼ .824; RMSEA ¼ .091; 90% CI: .081, .101.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%