2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2014.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development status of AEOLDOS – A deorbit module for small satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current state of developing HDSs and aerodynamic means of debris removal can be estimated from analysing studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Thus, it is proposed in [10,11] to use a permanent magnet harpoon system for SDOs, which increases the reliability of the harpoon devices of SD removal.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state of developing HDSs and aerodynamic means of debris removal can be estimated from analysing studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Thus, it is proposed in [10,11] to use a permanent magnet harpoon system for SDOs, which increases the reliability of the harpoon devices of SD removal.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oSat-1 recently put on orbit) and on-going work for ESEO DOM; in addition there are other projects at late stage, such as AEOLDOS [13]. 2.…”
Section: De-orbit Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the releasing board and burner resistor circuit design, we use the same system with the previous AEOLDOS project presented by Patrick Harkness from University of Glasgow [3].…”
Section: The Deploying Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Cubesats and PocketQubes as nanosatellites (1-10kg) and picosatellites (0.1-1kg), many space applications, say, data collection [1], earth observation [2], solar sail research [3], signal measurement [4], ship tracking [1], technical demonstration [5], and even asteroid exploration, etc, can be observed to prove their capacity with a low cost. Estimated by Alba Orbital, the cost of Pocketqube and Cubesat can be as low as around £22,000 and £99,000 respectively, including launching fee to LEO [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%