2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00410-1_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Path Planning Approach Based on Improved A-star Algorithm in AGV System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a global search algorithm commonly used in the AUV path planning. However, the A * algorithm will generate some unnecessary inflection points in the search process [31]. Moreover, the resulting final path is a multisegment path composed of many continuous straight lines, which is difficult to meet the requirements of AUV dynamic and kinematic constraints.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a global search algorithm commonly used in the AUV path planning. However, the A * algorithm will generate some unnecessary inflection points in the search process [31]. Moreover, the resulting final path is a multisegment path composed of many continuous straight lines, which is difficult to meet the requirements of AUV dynamic and kinematic constraints.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, compared with traditional algorithms, the algorithm and strategy proposed in this paper have the advantages of high efficiency, strong adaptive ability and low power consumption. For example, compared with the A star algorithm [26], it has the advantages of smooth trajectory, speed stability , low calculation complexity, and real-time dynamic characteristics; compared with the improved APF algorithm [27], it has the advantages of stable trajectory, fast convergence, short time consumption, high calculation accuracy and autonomous learning; compared with GBSOM and SOM [13], it has the advantages of dynamic and flexible grid space, efficient arrangement of neurons, step size can be adaptively changed, and adapt to time-varying ocean currents.…”
Section: Figure1 Flow Chart Of the Full Text Research Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to expand the influence range of the obstacle domain so that the sub-target nodes are far away from the obstacle space, which provides fault tolerance space for the errors caused by ocean current interference and sensor imbalance during the operation of the AUV individuals In addition, we consulted a large number of documents related to this research and discovered a widely used SOM algorithm [13], which has gradually become a research hotspot. However, the SOM algorithm and the improved Astar algorithm [26] have similar drawbacks, that is, there is a risk of speed jumping during the operation. In order to verify the accuracy of the algorithm proposed in this paper, we conducted a comparison simulation experiment between BNWN and SOM/Improved APF.…”
Section: Figure16: Simulation Experiments Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, centralized path planning methods are applicable only to the small-scale or low-density AGVS [29]. As for the UGN, which represents a static map, vehicles can directly use the classic Dijkstra algorithm [30] or A-star algorithm [31] to realize the autonomous path planning function. However, vehicles often conflict with each other when they are moving, so it is necessary to use an effective centralized traffic management approach to prevent collisions between vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%