2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70548-4_272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Eco-Engineering Sector Specific Routines and Curricula for the Mediterranean Region

Abstract: Highlights: Eco-enginering integrates soils, plants, and water bodies to provide resilience against climate change. The ecoengineering specialisation and skills level in the Mediterraniean can be enhanced by introducing relevant curriculum for students and practitioners. Preliminary studies across the sector suggest that learning and motivational theories can be efficiently employed to close the skills gap and develop the next generation of multi-disciplinary scientists and engineers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this perspective, it is important to compile and analyse more projects that have gone through (almost) a full project cycle. Although the present study included five projects where corrective measures were applied after the original design was found insufficient and the benefits of double-loop learning ( [12,25,26]) were recorded through the interviews, more projects need to be analysed with the existing framework in order to reflect the variety of eco-engineering works across Europe (and globally) and also to contextualise the problem-solving approach in eco-engineering where the applied measures were unsuccessful. This will contribute towards more focused KPIs which will reflect the opinions and experiences of various stakeholders [19] but also of the clients via completion of client satisfaction surveys which should be conducted in a structured manner [20].…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, it is important to compile and analyse more projects that have gone through (almost) a full project cycle. Although the present study included five projects where corrective measures were applied after the original design was found insufficient and the benefits of double-loop learning ( [12,25,26]) were recorded through the interviews, more projects need to be analysed with the existing framework in order to reflect the variety of eco-engineering works across Europe (and globally) and also to contextualise the problem-solving approach in eco-engineering where the applied measures were unsuccessful. This will contribute towards more focused KPIs which will reflect the opinions and experiences of various stakeholders [19] but also of the clients via completion of client satisfaction surveys which should be conducted in a structured manner [20].…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research results should then be used to develop methods and tools to assist management, conceptualization and action. Adaptation of these tools needs to be performed in collaboration with practitioners, while the knowledge transfer and learning should occur in training courses at every educational level (Mitsch, 2014;Mickovski et al, 2018). The application of knowledge to real cases using newly gained expertise should be verified.…”
Section: An Interactive Process Between Researchers and Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%