2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/1696848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Combinatorial Pulsed Laser Deposition for Expedited Device Optimization in CdTe/CdS Thin-Film Solar Cells

Abstract: A combinatorial pulsed laser deposition system was developed by integrating a computer controlled scanning sample stage in order to rapidly screen processing conditions relevant to CdTe/CdS thin-film solar cells. Using this system, the thickness of the CdTe absorber layer is varied across a single sample from 1.5 m to 0.75 m. The effects of thickness on CdTe grain morphology, crystal orientation, and cell efficiency were investigated with respect to different postprocessing conditions. It is shown that the thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, in which it can be seen that the As-deposited device without a Zn 2 SnO 4 buffer layer and CdCl 2 treatment show very poor parameters including open circuit voltage Voc, short circuit current density Jsc, Fill Factor FF and overall performance for both CdS thicknesses of 120nm and 80nm. This is well known to be attributed to the low temperature used to fabricate these layers at 200 C 0 that introduce poor structure properties and low CdTe layer doping as it has been already investigated previously (Kadhim, Harrison et al 2016. After exposing the device to the CdCl 2 treatment at 450C 0 as described in the experimental part above, the solar cells that has 120nm CdS thickness show improved Voc, Jsc, FF and efficiency ɳ (5.1%), (See Fig.4).…”
Section: Results and Discussion:-mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…4, in which it can be seen that the As-deposited device without a Zn 2 SnO 4 buffer layer and CdCl 2 treatment show very poor parameters including open circuit voltage Voc, short circuit current density Jsc, Fill Factor FF and overall performance for both CdS thicknesses of 120nm and 80nm. This is well known to be attributed to the low temperature used to fabricate these layers at 200 C 0 that introduce poor structure properties and low CdTe layer doping as it has been already investigated previously (Kadhim, Harrison et al 2016. After exposing the device to the CdCl 2 treatment at 450C 0 as described in the experimental part above, the solar cells that has 120nm CdS thickness show improved Voc, Jsc, FF and efficiency ɳ (5.1%), (See Fig.4).…”
Section: Results and Discussion:-mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Its development dates back to the mid-1990s 264 , with commercialization by companies such as Symyx Technologies, PVD Products, Neocera and Intermolecular spanning a wide application space. The systems developed by these companies can deposit whole libraries of compositions, starting from elemental or even compound sources [265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272] . This enables searches for individual phases, disordered structures, solid solutions, multilayered heterostructures, super-lattices and other discoveries.…”
Section: Automated Chemical Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite these advantages, the higher degree of control of the compositional gradient that can be achieved with PVD techniques makes them the preferred strategy for synthesizing thin-film combinatorial samples. [64] Focusing on chalcogenidebased solar cells, synthesized by combinatorial methods, there exist several works reporting the employment of sputtering, [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] a lower amount of articles report the use of thermal evaporation [80][81][82][83] and CBD, [66,84,85] and there are also reports describing the use of spray coating, [68,86] PLD, [87] and CVD. [88] The experimental setups required for adapting both PVD and CM techniques for the deposition of combinatorial samples are discussed in a review by McGinn.…”
Section: Preparation Of Combinatorial Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%