Development of a scale to measure diabetes self‐management behaviors among older <scp>K</scp>oreans with type 2 diabetes, <scp>b</scp>ased on the seven domains identified by the <scp>A</scp>merican <scp>A</scp>ssociation of <scp>D</scp>iabetes <scp>E</scp>ducators

Seo, Kyoungsan; Song, Misoon; Choi, Suyoung; Kim, Se-an; Chang, Sun Ju

doi:10.1111/jjns.12145

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…SDSCA bo [120]; SDSCA (Turkish version) [121]; SDSCA-G bp [122]; SDSCA (Moroccan version) [123]; SDSCA-Ar bq [124]; SDSCA-K br [125]; INAAP-DM2 bs [126]; SCI-R bt [127]; DSSCI bu [128]; SUGAAR bv [129]; D-SMART bw [119]; ES-SMBPA-2D bx [130]; DSMS by [116]; DSMQ bz (Thai version) [131]; DSMQ (Urdu version) [132]; V-DSMI ca [133]; DSMI-20 cb [134]; DSMB-O cc [135]; SMP-T2D cd [136];…”

Section: Proms a Description Categorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Wee¹,

Kwan²,

Loh³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The management of diabetes is complex. There is growing recognition of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a standardized method of obtaining an outlook on patients’ functional status and well-being. However, no systematic reviews have summarized the studies that investigate the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs. Objective Our aims were to conduct a systematic review of studies investigating the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs by evaluating the methodological quality and overall level of evidence of these PROMs and to categorize them based on the outcome measures assessed. Methods This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases. The PROMs were evaluated with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Results A total of 363 articles evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs for diabetes in the adult population were identified, of which 238 unique PROMs from 248 studies reported in 209 articles were validated in the type 2 diabetes population. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 of 9 measurement properties include the Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (C-PDQ), Diabetes Self-Management Instrument Short Form (DSMI-20), and Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale in Hong Kong primary care patients (C-ITAS-HK), of which the C-PDQ has a “sufficient (+)” rating for >4 measurement properties. A total of 43 PROMs meet the COSMIN guidelines for recommendation for use. Conclusions This study identified and synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of 238 unique PROMs for patients with type 2 diabetes and categorized the PROMs according to their outcome measures. These findings may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting appropriate high-quality PROMs for clinical practice and research. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020180978; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020180978.

show abstract

Section: Proms a Description Categorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Wee¹,

Kwan²,

Loh³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Until now, self-care behavior measures for patients with diabetes have focused mainly on measuring treatmentrelated effects of changes in diet and exercise. 8,[13][14][15] Thus, self-care assessments take time, and we were unable to find a scale for specifically assessing self-care related to the standard prescribed practice of foot care in older patients with diabetes. Additionally, in Japan's super-aged society, it is important to focus on foot care practices among older adults and cultivate good foot care practices in early older adulthood so that they can take care of themselves at home.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and Testing of the Foot Care Scale for Older Japanese Diabetic Patients

Sable-Morita

Arai

Takanashi

et al. 2021

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We aimed to develop and test the reliability and validity of a foot care self-management assessment tool for older Japanese patients with diabetes. In this cross-sectional observational study, which was carried out according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, additional items were developed and selected to reflect older Japanese patients’ needs a thorough investigation with experts in diabetes and geriatrics. A total of 200 older patients with diabetes in a foot care outpatient clinic were included in the study to finalize the scale items and verify the scale's reliability and validity. A factor analysis yielded a 4-factor, 9-item scale. Factors 1 to 4 were “skin condition” (3 items), “nail clipping” (2 items), “attention to wounds” (2 items), and “relationships with others” (2 items). The Cronbach's α coefficients for the 4 factors were .852, .900, .820, and .571, respectively. The overall scale was 0.797, indicating good internal consistency. Spearman's correlation coefficients for each of the 4 factors with the scale's total score showed good stability; all correlations were significant. In Japan's super-aged society, it is important to focus on foot care practices among older adults and to promote good foot care practices among early older adults so that they can practice self-care at home. Therefore, a scale for comprehensively evaluating foot care in elderly patients with diabetes is needed. The Foot Care Scale for Older Diabetics could be useful as a tool for assessing the ability to self-manage foot care in older Japanese patients with diabetes.

show abstract

“…The DSMB-O functions as a practical tool for evaluating diabetes self-management behaviors in older adults with type 2 diabetes. [24] Comprising 14 items based on the 7 domains identified by the AADE, the DSMB-O includes items related to 6 domains that necessitate daily performance, rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = “Never” to 3 = “Always”). The “Reducing risks” domain encompasses 1 item derived from the evaluation of 5 subitems, designed to yield a dichotomous response (“Yes”/“No”).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diabetes-related stress in older adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic complication: Multiple effects of social-ecological support on self-management behavior

Sun,

Shi,

Wang

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to explore the relationship among diabetes-related distress, social-ecological support, and self-management behavior in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic complications. This cross-sectional study included older adults with T2DM in Shanghai, China, between January and July 2022. The problem areas in diabetes scale (PAID), the chronic illness resource survey (CIRS), and the diabetes self-management behavior for older (DSMB-O) were employed. A total of 264 participants (157 [59.47%] males, aged 71.07 ± 6.47 years) were included; their T2DM duration ranged from 5 to 30 years, with an average of 11.19 ± 6.96 years. The DSMB-O scores were negatively correlated with the PAID scores and positively correlated with CIRS scores. The CIRS scores were negatively correlated with the PAID scores. CIRS had a positive direct effect on DSMB-O, and CIRS had an indirect effect on DSMB-O through PAID. CIRS had a total effect on DSMB-O through PAID. The mediating effect made up 28.89% of the total effect. In older adults with T2DM and chronic complications, chronic illness resources were correlated with diabetes-related distress and self-management behavior. Chronic illness resources had both a direct effect on self-management behavior and an indirect effect through diabetes-related distress.

show abstract

Development of a scale to measure diabetes self‐management behaviors among older Koreans with type 2 diabetes, based on the seven domains identified by the American Association of Diabetes Educators

Abstract: The DSMB-O is short and easy for older Koreans to use, as well as having acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Hence, the DSMB-O can be a useful tool to evaluate diabetes self-management behaviors in older Koreans with type 2 diabetes.

Cited by 9 publications

References 19 publications

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Development and Testing of the Foot Care Scale for Older Japanese Diabetic Patients

Diabetes-related stress in older adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic complication: Multiple effects of social-ecological support on self-management behavior

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About