Development of a novel mindfulness and cognitive behavioral intervention for stress-eating: A comparative pilot study

Corsica, Joyce A.; Hood, Megan M.; Katterman, Shawn N.; Kleinman, Brighid M.; Ivan, Iulia I.

doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.08.002

Cited by 46 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Weight loss was seen in eight (13,16,28,30,31,37,40,43) of the sixteen studies in overweight/obese population studies. However, the effect sizes varied widely with only three studies reporting significant weight loss (13,16,37) ; the latter of these reported a mean weight loss of 12 (SE 4) kg over 6 months.…”

Section: Results Of Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the effect sizes varied widely with only three studies reporting significant weight loss (13,16,37) ; the latter of these reported a mean weight loss of 12 (SE 4) kg over 6 months. In two studies the weight loss was minimal (28,30) , and in two studies weight was stabilised or weight gain was less in the intervention group (31,43) . In one study results were not reported (40) .…”

Section: Results Of Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the eight studies that reported weight loss in overweight/obese populations, five of them were comprehensive mindfulness programmes (13,16,30,31,40) where mindful eating was a component of the programme, although details of the intervention were not reported in one of these studies (40) . The rest of these programmes taught the core elements of mindfulness such as being present in the moment and self-acceptance of the current state.…”

Section: Results Of Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The search yielded twenty-three studies (twenty-four papers) in overweight/obese subjects (11,13,14,16,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43) and twenty-nine papers describing interventions in normal-weight subjects (15,18,34,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61) .…”

Section: Results -Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Initial search yielded n 99 papers (25,27,33,40) Mindful eating Four studies (28,29,36,43) MBSR Three studies (13,30,54) Mindfulness Three studies (11,32,35,44) Mindful eating and MB-EAT Three studies (14,16,38,41) Mindfulness-based action committed therapy Two studies (38,42) Combination of MBSR, MBCT and MB-EAT One study (31) Acceptance-based behaviour intervention One study (37) Acceptance of cravings One study (24) Intuitive eating One study (26) MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; MBSR, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction; MB-EAT, Mindfulness-Based Eating Awareness Training.…”

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A structured literature review on the role of mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating in changing eating behaviours: effectiveness and associated potential mechanisms

Warren¹,

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The role of mindfulness, mindful eating and a newer concept of intuitive eating in modulating eating habits is an area of increasing interest. In this structured literature review, a summary of the current evidence is presented, together with details of interventions undertaken and the tools to measure outcomes. It is broad in scope given the emerging evidence base in this area. The review yielded sixty-eight publications: twenty-three interventions in obese/overweight populations; twenty-nine interventions in normal-weight populations; sixteen observational studies, three of which were carried out in overweight/obese populations. Mindfulness-based approaches appear most effective in addressing binge eating, emotional eating and eating in response to external cues. There is a lack of compelling evidence for the effectiveness of mindfulness and mindful eating in weight management. Mindfulness-based approaches may prevent weight gain. Reduced food intake was seen in some of the studies in overweight and obese populations, but this was less apparent in the studies in normal-weight populations. The evidence base for intuitive eating is limited to date and further research is needed to examine its potential in altering eating behaviours. Mindfulness appears to work by an increased awareness of internal, rather than external, cues to eat. Mindfulness and mindful eating have the potential to address problematic eating behaviours and the challenges many face with controlling their food intake. Encouraging a mindful eating approach would seem to be a positive message to be included in general weight management advice to the public.

show abstract

Section: Results Of Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results Of Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results Of Physiological Health Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Results -Intervention Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nutrition Research Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A structured literature review on the role of mindfulness, mindful eating and intuitive eating in changing eating behaviours: effectiveness and associated potential mechanisms

Warren¹,

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Anxiety and stress over COVID‐19 pandemic associated with increased eating

Himmelstein

Beaver

Gilman

2021

Obesity Science & Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Stressful experiences can dramatically affect eating. The relatively sudden, global emergence of the COVID‐19 pandemic served as a massive stressor to virtually all people, regardless of infection status. This study hypothesized that actual and perceived stressors from the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, in the categories of recurring disruptions, environmental threat, and social isolation would be positively associated with increased self‐reported eating in the United States. Methods Over 1100 English‐fluent adults (52.8% women) living in the United States were recruited for a cross‐sectional online survey about eating, COVID‐19 consequences, and stress experiences. Linear regressions examined associations between perceived stress on five eating measures, and individual differences in personal/work situations, perceptions, and adverse experiences during the pandemic. Results Anxiety, worry, and stress over, rather than direct consequences of, COVID‐19 were most consistently associated with self‐reported increased eating. Largely, these fell into the stressor categories of environmental threat and social isolation, not recurring disruptions. Body mass index and current self‐reported eating pathology symptoms were also consistently associated with these outcomes. Conclusions These correlational findings suggest specific stressors have pronounced influences on eating behavior of US adults. Remotely deliverable stress mitigation strategies should be explored to attenuate increased eating.

show abstract