Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3287324.3287390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Lean Computational Thinking Abilities Assessment for Middle Grades Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, we have utilized curricular materials that leverage both definitions of CT: as a set of skills specific to CS and as a more general problem‐solving skill set. Because of this, we have utilized a validated assessment that combines both items with a computer programming context and puzzle‐like items that focus on a more general problem‐solving context (Wiebe et al, 2019).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, we have utilized curricular materials that leverage both definitions of CT: as a set of skills specific to CS and as a more general problem‐solving skill set. Because of this, we have utilized a validated assessment that combines both items with a computer programming context and puzzle‐like items that focus on a more general problem‐solving context (Wiebe et al, 2019).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some notable exceptions to the issues mentioned above are the Computational Thinking test (CTt;Román-González, 2015;Román-González et al, 2017, the assessment created by Grover and Basu (2017), the Middle Grades Computer Science Concept Inventory (MG-CSCI; Rachmatullah et al, 2020), the Lean Computational Thinking Abilities Assessment (LCTAA; Wiebe et al, 2019), the Beginners Computational Thinking Test (BCCt; Zapata-Caceres et al, 2020), and the PESS framework (Mannila et al, 2020).…”
Section: Assessment Of Programming Concepts Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, it is possible to find several other published computer-based or paper-pencil CT tests usable in different contexts; however, effectiveness of those approaches is still being investigated (Werner, Denner, & Campe, 2012;Román-González, 2015). An interesting approach to CT assessment combines tasks from specific CT assessment (CTt) and Bebras challenge assessments (Wiebe, et al, 2019). By combining the two assessments, a subset of tasks was selected to create a promising assessment that could be applicable in a reasonable time, but also be suitable for pupils with no previous programming experience.…”
Section: Ct Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the instrument can collect quality information on the development of pupils' computational thinking during the teaching process. The authors emphasize the need for further research on the issue of validity and further work on the selection of an appropriate subset of tasks (Wiebe, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Ct Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%