Development of a jellyfish reconnaissance and removal robot system using unmanned aerial and surface vehicles

Kim, Dong-Hoon; Kim, Hangeun; Jung, Sungwook; Myung, Hyun; Kim, Jong‐Heon; Shin, Jae-Uk; Myung, Hyun

doi:10.1109/urai.2015.7358971

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…USV offers advantages to reduce operating costs compared to using conventional boats [3]. USV has helped resolve various problems including for jellyfish removal robot system which can remove jellyfish using an autonomous navigation system [4], USV for antisubmarine warfare [5] and water quality monitoring and measurement [6]. Mostly, USV were used to observe areas of water use local communications such as Zigbee protocol technology that has ultra-low power consumption and low cost [7], and use wireless LAN based on IP addressing [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Controlling Unmanned Surface Vehicle Using MQTT Protocol

Atmoko

Yang

Alfiani³

et al. 2019

CNAPC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract- The communication system at USV is the most important part of ensuring that the USV control system runs well. Communication systems that are commonly used at USV are generally still local networks. The development of a wider range of communications is needed to improve USV scalability so that the benefits can be increased to support the concept of remote laboratory and remote surveillance. USV is generally controlled using a wireless network with a limited work area using WIFI or using another electromagnetic waves transmission. This research proposes the development control and monitoring systems of USV to be controlled over the Internet by using the message queuing telemetry transport(MQTT) Protocol. This idea makes the USV can be controlled remotely, no longer have to operate it in the field. The control speed response of rudder and motor are analyzed. Performance monitoring of the compass sensor, GPS, and cameras also showed good results. As a result, the average delay time generated is 1.6 second.

show abstract