2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a French Isometric Strength Normative Database for Adults Using Quantitative Muscle Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
66
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This function could be a good candidate to assess the impact of a therapeutic intervention. It also presents a good intra‐ and interrater reproducibility 16. As for the MFM, the total score and the D1 showed a moderate change over 4 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This function could be a good candidate to assess the impact of a therapeutic intervention. It also presents a good intra‐ and interrater reproducibility 16. As for the MFM, the total score and the D1 showed a moderate change over 4 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…QMT was performed using fixed dynamometry. Strength values were expressed in percentage of predicted values computed for age, sex, and weight using predictive equations already published 16. This normalization allows computing composite scores in a suitable way.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] The purpose of this study was to generate a reference dataset of normative values across the lifespan for an extensive set of isometric muscle strength and joint flexibility items, stratified for age and sex, and to investigate the influence of demographic and anthropometric factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Given the need for continued investigation into the role of lower extremity strength and its association with injury and reinjury, assessment methods need to be both accessible and reliable. Researchers have measured lower extremity muscular strength using various isometric, [15][16][17][18] isotonic, [19][20][21][22] and isokinetic [23][24][25][26] methods. These assessments can further be classified into 3 categories: tertiary, secondary, and primary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%