2015
DOI: 10.1177/0957650915595177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a cylindrical burner comprising multiple pairs of opposing partially premixed or inverse diffusion flames

Abstract: A cylindrical burner was developed to combine extensive firing limits, high combustion efficiencies, and low NOx emissions from partially premixed or inverse diffusion flames by setting multiple pairs of circumferentially opposing jets (of concentric fuel and air streams). Normal strain rates as high as 1600 s−1 in addition to transverse strain rates of 640 s−1 were combined with a cross-flow impact and elliptical jet dispersion such that a turbulent kinetic energy peak of 15.4 m2/s2 was produced. The fuel/air… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end, it is worthy to highlight that relative to the burner of opposing premixed flames with a crossflow of methane-air mixture, 13 the blowout velocity limit was currently extended by 26.1%. When it is compared to the burner of opposing nonpremixed methane-air flames with a cross-flow of air, 24 the flame length herein decreased by 35.9% and the Figure 10. Effect of the equivalence ratio, number of opposing jets, and jets' diameter-to-separation ratio on the exhaust NOx emissions (at MP ¼ 10.3%).…”
Section: Resultant Firing Limits and Nox Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At the end, it is worthy to highlight that relative to the burner of opposing premixed flames with a crossflow of methane-air mixture, 13 the blowout velocity limit was currently extended by 26.1%. When it is compared to the burner of opposing nonpremixed methane-air flames with a cross-flow of air, 24 the flame length herein decreased by 35.9% and the Figure 10. Effect of the equivalence ratio, number of opposing jets, and jets' diameter-to-separation ratio on the exhaust NOx emissions (at MP ¼ 10.3%).…”
Section: Resultant Firing Limits and Nox Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end, it is worthy to highlight that relative to the burner of opposing premixed flames with a cross-flow of methane–air mixture, 13 the blowout velocity limit was currently extended by 26.1%. When it is compared to the burner of opposing nonpremixed methane–air flames with a cross-flow of air, 24 the flame length herein decreased by 35.9% and the combustion efficiency increased by 14.6% since the transport of active species becomes faster in the presence of a hydrogen diffusion flame. A future study can be commissioned for having the hydrogen normal diffusion flame stabilized prior to the injection of methane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They stimulated turbulent non-premixed combustion in the distributed reaction zone regime by enforcing multiple opposing fuel jets radially inward to be mixed with an air jet issuing vertically upward. More recently, Kamal 13 highlighted the duplication in the stagnation centers and the multiplication in the recirculation zones when multiple pairs of opposing jets are set with a cross-flow in a cylindrical burner to stabilize partially premixed or inverse diffusion flames. In the light of these previous works, the novelty of the current work is to utilize the multiple jets’ opposing flow field with a cross-flow in extending the stability limits of premixed flames and noticing the parametric effects of the number of opposing jets, their diameter, and axial separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%