2004
DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone

Abstract: To meet the need for an objective self-test for hearing screening. a new Dutch speech-in-noise test was developed. Digit triplets were used as speech material. The test was made fully automatic, was controlled by a computer, and can be done by telephone. It measures the speech reception threshold (triplet SRT(n)) using an adaptive procedure, in about 3 min. Our experiments showed no significant influence of telephone type or listening environment. Measurement errors were within 1 dB. which makes the test accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
456
3
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(522 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(41 reference statements)
18
456
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For speech-in-noise testing, we applied a stand-alone version of the telephone test (Smits et al 2004), installed on a laptop computer. The SRT test uses an adaptive procedure, a simple one-up one-down procedure with a step size of 2 dB.…”
Section: Speech Reception In Noise (Srt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For speech-in-noise testing, we applied a stand-alone version of the telephone test (Smits et al 2004), installed on a laptop computer. The SRT test uses an adaptive procedure, a simple one-up one-down procedure with a step size of 2 dB.…”
Section: Speech Reception In Noise (Srt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…moderate hearing). No participants scored higher than ¡1.4, indicating poor hearing as deWned by Smits et al (2004).…”
Section: Evects In the Pure-tone Audiogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the asynchronous automated protocol, large scale hearing screening can be accomplished with a local facilitator tasked with patient scheduling, taking and recording relevant case history, initiating and monitoring equipment with automated protocols, and forwarding all pertinent information especially when the decision support software in the automated programme indicates that referral is necessary. Alternately, self hearing screening services may be available over the telephone or Internet as recently reported for screening adults and adolescents in the Netherlands (Smits, Kapteyn & Houtgast, 2004;Smits, Merkus & Houtgast, 2006). The speech-in-noise screening test uses triple digit stimuli presented in an adaptive paradigm and can be done quickly and with results comparable to other speech in noise tests 13 (Smits, Kapteyn & Houtgast, 2004;Smits, Merkus & Houtgast, 2006).…”
Section: Field Of Application Scope Of Telehealth Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternately, self hearing screening services may be available over the telephone or Internet as recently reported for screening adults and adolescents in the Netherlands (Smits, Kapteyn & Houtgast, 2004;Smits, Merkus & Houtgast, 2006). The speech-in-noise screening test uses triple digit stimuli presented in an adaptive paradigm and can be done quickly and with results comparable to other speech in noise tests 13 (Smits, Kapteyn & Houtgast, 2004;Smits, Merkus & Houtgast, 2006). Obviously, the greatest benefit of this technique is accessibility since hearing screening may be only a phone call away.…”
Section: Field Of Application Scope Of Telehealth Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used for speech intelligibility measurements and for clinical purposes (Fletcher, 1929;Pruszewicz et al, 1994a, b), auditory screening (Smits et al, 2004;Wagener et al, 2005a) and in studies on the influence of speech context on intelligibility (Miller et al, 1951;Kalikow et al, 1977). They have been also used for a study devoted to pronunciation differences between native and non-native American English speakers (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%