2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a 3D numerical model for TBM–EPB mechanised excavations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TBM shield is assumed as a cylindrical shape with conicity ignored [29]. Due to the presence of the cutter-head as well as chamber, the elastic modulus and thickness of the shield in the models are 10 and 2 times greater than those in Table 2, respectively [30].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Three-dimensional Entitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TBM shield is assumed as a cylindrical shape with conicity ignored [29]. Due to the presence of the cutter-head as well as chamber, the elastic modulus and thickness of the shield in the models are 10 and 2 times greater than those in Table 2, respectively [30].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Three-dimensional Entitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of over-excavation for articulated TBM shield is illustrated in Figure 5, where LM1 and LM2 are the lengths of front shield body and rear shield body, respectively [32]. Considering promptly support after excavation, it is assumed that the overcutting ω is equal to one-third of the theoretical value (Ga) [33,34]: The TBM shield is assumed as a cylindrical shape with conicity ignored [29]. Due to the presence of the cutter-head as well as chamber, the elastic modulus and thickness of the shield in the models are 10 and 2 times greater than those in Table 2, respectively [30].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Three-dimensional Entitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, less works have been devoted to its effect on the tunnel lining behaviour. Generally, simple constitutive models lead to a shallower and wider settlement trough than the one observed experimentally (Bolton et al, 1994;Addenbrooke et al, 1997;Masin and Herle, 2005;Hejazi et al, 2008;Rodriguez, 2008;Lambrughi et al, 2012). Their studies indicate that in order to take into account some of the fundamental aspects of soil behavior, such as the variation inthe stiffness modulus, according to the stress state and the difference in the modulus during the unloading and loading phases, it is at least necessary to use an elasto-plastic model with strain hardening.…”
Section: Ajasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the face pressure has been modelled by applying a pressure distribution to the excavation face (Melis et al, 2002;Kasper and Meschke, 2004;Mroueh and Shahrour, 2008;Lambrughi et al, 2012;Mollon et al, 2013), using a trapezoidal profile in order to account of the slurry density. The unit weight of the slurry is taken equal to 11 kN/m 3 .…”
Section: Simulation Of Different Phases Of the Mechanized Tunnelling mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, the numerical analyses are increasingly used in the design of the underground structures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The designers can work with different userfriendly commercial software and relatively easy simulate the behaviour of the soil mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%