2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a laboratory risk score for the early prediction of COVID-19 severity and in-hospital mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies also included SpO 2 as a predictor [ 24 , 27 , 30 , 37 , 39 ]. The present cutoff value of 90% upon admission was compatible with reported values under 94% [ 24 , 26 , 33 , 37 ]. A number of patients already required supplementary oxygen before admission, thus ambient-air saturation values were not available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies also included SpO 2 as a predictor [ 24 , 27 , 30 , 37 , 39 ]. The present cutoff value of 90% upon admission was compatible with reported values under 94% [ 24 , 26 , 33 , 37 ]. A number of patients already required supplementary oxygen before admission, thus ambient-air saturation values were not available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In accordance with our findings, age was identified as a significant predictor across studies [ 23 28 , 30 37 , 39 ]. If its influence was quantified via cutoff values, these mostly ranged between 60 and 75 years [ 25 , 26 , 30 32 , 36 , 37 ] and thus were not markedly different from the value of 70 years which we found adequate for all outcomes. Studies also included SpO 2 as a predictor [ 24 , 27 , 30 , 37 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Most studies published to-date have focused on mortality or severe COVID-19, although the findings were similar to those in the current study [36,37,38] [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In comparison to other scores (see Additional file 1 : Table S1), our predictive score had at least equivalent or better predictive performance for short term mortality and/or ICU requirement and can be determined quickly after hospital admission, using only two parameters potentially routinely available: IL-6 and CATi alleviating the need for many other expensive biological measurements (see Additional file 1 : Table S1). As an example, Bennouar et al validate a risk score including age and 6 biological variables (blood urea nitrogen, LDH, NLR, CRP, albumin and natremia) combined into an ordinal risk score consisting of seven consecutive levels (S0-S7), survival duration decreasing gradually with increasing risk score levels [ 30 ]. Another score has been developed by Liang et al to predict admission to ICU, invasive ventilation, and death including 10 variables (chest radiographic abnormality, age, hemoptysis, dyspnea, level of consciousness, number of comorbidities, cancer history, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase and direct bilirubin) [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%