2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and field testing of a consumer shared decision-making training program for adults with low literacy

Abstract: A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Highlights  We developed a comprehensive consumer SDM training program for adults with low literacy for delivery in education settings. The program aims to improve SDM knowledge, skills and self-efficacy.  Consumer input was fundamental in our iterative development process. *Highlights (for review)Page 2 of 34 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t as a means to engage in SDM during healthcare interactions. Conclusions:There is an ethical imperative to develop SDM intervent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resources needed to adequately prepare this vulnerable population to effectively and equitably participate in the SDM process in outpatient studies has been considerable, requiring six hours, in one study. 74 These resources and time are not typically available in the rapid-paced ED setting, and in the setting of acute illness or cognitive impairment would likely require even more resources and time. The question of how best to involve our patients to the degree that they are able and prefer is an important one and underpins all the other SDM research foci in this patient population.…”
Section: Stage 4 Of Sdm In the Ed: Participating In The Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resources needed to adequately prepare this vulnerable population to effectively and equitably participate in the SDM process in outpatient studies has been considerable, requiring six hours, in one study. 74 These resources and time are not typically available in the rapid-paced ED setting, and in the setting of acute illness or cognitive impairment would likely require even more resources and time. The question of how best to involve our patients to the degree that they are able and prefer is an important one and underpins all the other SDM research foci in this patient population.…”
Section: Stage 4 Of Sdm In the Ed: Participating In The Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a novel SDM training programme for adults with lower literacy to develop communicative and critical health literacy skills . The programme was delivered in Australian adult basic education settings in 2014 by trained adult educators as a core component of a broader health literacy programme and was evaluated as a cluster‐randomized controlled trial .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 We developed a novel SDM training programme for adults with lower literacy to develop communicative and critical health literacy skills. 14 The programme was delivered in Australian adult basic education settings in 2014 by trained adult educators as a core component of a broader health literacy programme and was evaluated as a cluster-randomized controlled trial. 15 An exploratory qualitative substudy was conducted with adult educators who participated in the trial to explore views and experiences of teaching health literacy skills (including SDM) and determine whether the programme is contextually appropriate and sufficiently tailored to learner needs, and teaching and institutional objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, adult patients with lower literacy often have greater difficulty in understanding complex medical problems and may experience a greater power imbalance between the doctor and themselves. Muscat et al [2] discuss the creation of a SDM intervention, developed for adult low literacy patients. While it takes two to tango in medical consultations, as we learned from Charles et al [3], the authors shift the focus to patient education, providing an intervention that allows patients to take a more active role in SDM.…”
Section: Shared Decision Making: Implementation In Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%