2012
DOI: 10.7718/iamure.ije.v1i1.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of a Teaching Guide in English Plus

Abstract: The study devised a teacher-made test to identify the needs and difficulties of the students in English Plus and the results were utilized to revise and enrich the syllabus. The descriptive – evaluative method was employed in this research. A teacher-made test was administered to 200 students selected by random sample. Content analysis of the syllabi of the professors and instructors were used as basis in constructing the teacher-made test. The areas under the English Proficiency Test in the SSC Admission Test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies also focused on the development of instructional materials such as worktext, module, and teaching guide. These studies include the development and validation of English teaching guide (Gilbas et al, 2012), English worktext (Ambayon & Millenes, 2020); English instructional material (Aragon, 2020), and instructional materials in other disciplines such as science and mathematics (Dio, 2017;Esquierdo & Ballado, 2021;Mercado, 2020;Rogayan & Dollete, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies also focused on the development of instructional materials such as worktext, module, and teaching guide. These studies include the development and validation of English teaching guide (Gilbas et al, 2012), English worktext (Ambayon & Millenes, 2020); English instructional material (Aragon, 2020), and instructional materials in other disciplines such as science and mathematics (Dio, 2017;Esquierdo & Ballado, 2021;Mercado, 2020;Rogayan & Dollete, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%