2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of the drop number size moment modelling to spray combustion simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, at the neck of spray the flame growth is certainly disturbed by this gas circulation. The flux of backward gas velocity is relatively high in the spray neck The chemical reaction is dominant in the first period of combustion, and the turbulent reaction is carried on in the main combustion subsequently [5]. This effect of dominant reaction is also presented evidently in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, at the neck of spray the flame growth is certainly disturbed by this gas circulation. The flux of backward gas velocity is relatively high in the spray neck The chemical reaction is dominant in the first period of combustion, and the turbulent reaction is carried on in the main combustion subsequently [5]. This effect of dominant reaction is also presented evidently in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The reaction rate obtained by calculating the pressure difference in combustion chamber reaches a peak at 2.5 ms after injection. In the simulation, the auto-ignition here is defined as the moment at which temperature is over 1000 K. Hence, the predicted ignition results here employing the PDF-EBU ignition model [5] is established at 2.13 ms and located at around 32.6 mm away from nozzle and 4.8 mm above centreline. This simulation corresponds to the experimental results of [13][14][15][16] that the ignition site of higher injection pressure, more than 100 MPa, appears in the leading vapour zone, while the ignition occurs in the periphery of liquid core for the lower pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the predicted results from both ignition models are satisfactory in predicting the ignition delay time, the ignition kernel location predicted by the PDF-EBU ignition model corresponds to the power-law scaling of Siebers rather than that by the Shell model. The more details of lift-off length discussion are given in Dhuchakallaya [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%