Developing scientific information to support decisions for sustainable coral reef ecosystem services

Yee, Susan H.; Carriger, John F.; Bradley, Patricia; Fisher, William S.; Dyson, Brian

doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.016

Cited by 37 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Pendekatan DPSIR untuk mengetahui keterkaitan faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya tekanan terhadap ekosistem sehingga dapat digunakan untuk menilai intensitas penggunaan sumberdaya oleh manusia dan aktivitas di kawasan pesisir, keterkaitan antara sistem ekologi dan sosial atau biasa disebut sistem sosial-ekologi (SES). Penilaian tekanan terhadap ekosistem dianalisis berdasarkan pendekatan keseluruhan sistem dan integrasi ekosistem yang berkaitan dengan struktur, komposisi dan fungsinya berdasarkan indikator ruang meliputi bentang alam, tata guna air, dan biodiversity (Yee et al, 2014). Kerangka tentang metode analisis dengan pendekatan DPSIR dapat dilihat pada Gambar 2.…”

Section: Analisis Ses Dengan Dpsir (Drivers-pressures-states-impacts-unclassified

Sistem Sosial Ekologi Kawasan Desa Pesisir Kabupaten Subang

Muliani

Adrianto

Soewardi

et al. 2018

J. Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interactions of the socio-ecological systems in the coastal villages often create problems, ranging from the declining ecological quality to social conflicts. This study aimed not only to analyze the socio-ecological systems in the villages of Blanakan, Tanjungtiga, Rawameneng, and Mayangan, but also to find out the connectivity network of socio-ecological systems of the integrated coastal villages. The data collected included primary and secondary data related to social and ecological systems. The data analysis was performed in descriptive-quantitative and descriptive-spatial manners. The results showed that the socio-ecological systems of Blanakan Village, Tanjungtiga Village, Rawameneng Village, and Mayangan Village were composed of resource networks such as fish resources, ecosystem resources, land resources, and water resources used by fishermen, farmers and general public. The sustainable utilization of the resources was supported by the availability of infrastructure provided by the government and the private sector. The connectivity network of socio-ecological ecosystems of the integrated coastal villages showed that the social systems among coastal villages were connected through educational interactions, fishermen institutions, health services, and other interactions, while the interaction of the ecological system was connected through fishing ground networks and the shared utilization of mangrove ecosystems, especially between Blanakan Village and Mayangan Village. ABSTRAKInteraksi sistem sosial -ekologi di desa pesisir sering menimbulkan permasalahan, mulai dari menurunnya kualitas ekologi hingga terjadinya konflik sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis sistem sosial -ekologi yang terdapat di Desa Blanakan, Desa Tanjungtiga, Desa Rawameneng, dan Desa Mayangan serta mengetahui jaringan konektivitas sistem sosial -ekologi dari desa pesisir yang terintegrasi. Data yang dikumpulkan berupa data primer dan sekunder terkait sistem sosial dan sistem ekologi, analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif kuantitatif dan spasial deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem sosial -ekologi Desa Blanakan, Desa Tanjungtiga, Desa Rawameneng, dan Desa Mayangan tersusun atas jaringan sumberdaya berupa sumberdaya ikan, sumberdaya ekosistem, sumberdaya lahan, dan sumberdaya air yang digunakan oleh nelayan, petani, dan masyarakat umum. Keberlanjutan pemanfaatan sumberdaya didukung oleh ketersediaan infrastruktur yang disediakan oleh pemerintah dan swasta. Jaringan konektivitas sistem sosialekologi dari integrasi desa pesisir menunjukkan bahwa sistem sosial antar desa pesisir terkonektivitas melalui interaksi pendidikan, kelembagaan nelayan, pelayaanan kesehatan, dan interaksi lainnya, sedangkan interaksi sistem ekologi terkonektivitas melalui jaringan fishing ground dan pemanfaatan ekosistem mangrove secara bersama terutama antara Desa Blanakan dan Desa Mayangan.

show abstract

Section: Analisis Ses Dengan Dpsir (Drivers-pressures-states-impacts-unclassified

Sistem Sosial Ekologi Kawasan Desa Pesisir Kabupaten Subang

Muliani

Adrianto

Soewardi

et al. 2018

J. Ilmu dan Teknologi Kelautan Tropis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Co‐creating a conceptual systems model could help identify pathways driving change in the physical, ecological and social components of the system (Yee et al . ). Interdisciplinary conversations can foster better understanding of the key drivers and outcomes of ecosystem change.…”

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Coordination across monitoring agencies could be promoted through a common understanding of the different drivers of information operating at ecological and management scales. Co-creating a conceptual systems model could help identify pathways driving change in the physical, ecological and social components of the system (Yee et al 2015). Interdisciplinary conversations can foster better understanding of the key drivers and outcomes of ecosystem change.…”

Section: P R O M O T E S Y N E R G I S M W I T H I N a N D B E T W E mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecosystem monitoring for ecosystem‐based management: using a polycentric approach to balance information trade‐offs

Heenan

Williams

Levine

et al. 2016

Journal of Applied Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…(13) Such applications have shown great promise in the fields of risk and environmental management, particularly in translating difficult concepts for the public (increasing understanding), ensuring participants are satisfied and confident about their contributions, and generating actionable, adaptive risk management decisions. (4,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) These approaches rely on a general philosophy of decomposing complex problems into more cognitively manageable steps: problem identification, the specification of objectives, the creation of alternatives and recognition of their consequences, and analyzing tradeoffs. (22,23) Such steps have been shown to reduce the extent to which individuals anchor on alternatives, improve the evaluability of options, balance analytical and intuitive modes of reasoning, and assist decisionmakers in making choices that better reflect their prioritized objectives, (20) each of which is critical in adding legitimacy to the decision-making process and its outcome.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expanding the Reach of Participatory Risk Management: Testing an Online Decision‐Aiding Framework for Informing Internally Consistent Choices

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents research aimed at developing and testing an online, multistakeholder decision-aiding framework for informing multiattribute risk management choices associated with energy development and climate change. The framework was designed to provide necessary background information and facilitate internally consistent choices, or choices that are in line with users' prioritized objectives. In order to test different components of the decision-aiding framework, a six-part, 2 × 2 × 2 factorial experiment was conducted, yielding eight treatment scenarios. The three factors included: (1) whether or not users could construct their own alternatives; (2) the level of detail regarding the composition of alternatives users would evaluate; and (3) the way in which a final choice between users' own constructed (or highest-ranked) portfolio and an internally consistent portfolio was presented. Participants' self-reports revealed the framework was easy to use and providing an opportunity to develop one's own risk-management alternatives (Factor 1) led to the highest knowledge gains. Empirical measures showed the internal consistency of users' decisions across all treatments to be lower than expected and confirmed that providing information about alternatives' composition (Factor 2) resulted in the least internally consistent choices. At the same time, those users who did not develop their own alternatives and were not shown detailed information about the composition of alternatives believed their choices to be the most internally consistent. These results raise concerns about how the amount of information provided and the ability to construct alternatives may inversely affect users' real and perceived internal consistency.

show abstract

Developing scientific information to support decisions for sustainable coral reef ecosystem services

Cited by 37 publications

References 63 publications

Sistem Sosial Ekologi Kawasan Desa Pesisir Kabupaten Subang

Sistem Sosial Ekologi Kawasan Desa Pesisir Kabupaten Subang

Ecosystem monitoring for ecosystem‐based management: using a polycentric approach to balance information trade‐offs

Expanding the Reach of Participatory Risk Management: Testing an Online Decision‐Aiding Framework for Informing Internally Consistent Choices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About