Developing Cybersecurity Capacity: A proof-of-concept implementation guide

Bellasio, Jacopo; Flint, Richard Foster; Ryan, Nathan; Søndergaard, Susanne Friis; Monsalve, Cristina Gonzalez; Meranto, Arya Sofia; Knack, Anna

doi:10.7249/rr2072

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CCB includes a range of projects with the aim to address digital risks in recipient countries. These can be divided into five overarching thematic categories: policy and strategy; culture and society; education and skills; regulation; and standards (Bellasio et al 2018). The Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre at the University of Oxford has developed the "Capacity Maturity Model (CMM)" to assess a nation's current capacity and needs across these five categories (Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre 2016).…”

Section: Types Of Ccb Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Vulnerabilities and the Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries

Schia¹,

Willers²

2021

Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Types Of Ccb Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Vulnerabilities and the Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries

Schia¹,

Willers²

2021

Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As these crimes continue to rise each year and account for billions of dollars in annual losses (U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Internet Crime Complaint Center, 2019), many network and computer breaches that give criminals access to valuable personal information are avoidable (Bellasio, et al, 2018). However, a user's ability to guard against victimization heavily depends on their access to needed education and resources.…”

Section: Digital Intersections With Criminal Justice and Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital inequalities 3.0: Emergent inequalities in the information age

Robinson¹,

Schulz²,

Dunn³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marking the 25th anniversary of the “digital divide,” we continue our metaphor of the digital inequality stack by mapping out the rapidly evolving nature of digital inequality using a broad lens. We tackle complex, and often unseen, inequalities spawned by the platform economy, automation, big data, algorithms, cybercrime, cybersafety, gaming, emotional well-being, assistive technologies, civic engagement, and mobility. These inequalities are woven throughout the digital inequality stack in many ways including differentiated access, use, consumption, literacies, skills, and production. While many users are competent prosumers who nimbly work within different layers of the stack, very few individuals are “full stack engineers” able to create or recreate digital devices, networks, and software platforms as pure producers. This new frontier of digital inequalities further differentiates digitally skilled creators from mere users. Therefore, we document emergent forms of inequality that radically diminish individuals’ agency and augment the power of technology creators, big tech, and other already powerful social actors whose dominance is increasing.

show abstract