2023
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and deploying deep learning models in brain magnetic resonance imaging: A review

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain has benefited from deep learning (DL) to alleviate the burden on radiologists and MR technologists, and improve throughput. The easy accessibility of DL tools has resulted in a rapid increase of DL models and subsequent peer‐reviewed publications. However, the rate of deployment in clinical settings is low. Therefore, this review attempts to bring together the ideas from data collection to deployment in the clinic, building on the guidelines and principles that acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluations with five patients showed the ability of the BNN to estimate physiological parameters better than the NLLS. Nevertheless, larger studies are required to carry out a full assessment of the benefits and limitations of the proposed approach in clinical practice (Aggarwal et al 2023). One limitation of the BNN is the use of a fixed temporal resolution of 6 seconds for simulating the training C p (t) and C(t).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluations with five patients showed the ability of the BNN to estimate physiological parameters better than the NLLS. Nevertheless, larger studies are required to carry out a full assessment of the benefits and limitations of the proposed approach in clinical practice (Aggarwal et al 2023). One limitation of the BNN is the use of a fixed temporal resolution of 6 seconds for simulating the training C p (t) and C(t).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A BNN was trained with CTCs generated without the testing data AIF. The patient data with this OD-AIF for validating the BNN was a unique scan with the same acquisition parameters as the training data as recommended in good machine learning practices (Aggarwal et al 2023).…”
Section: Uncertainty Evaluation Of Od Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no formal definitions for interpretability and explainability in the field of Artificial Intelligence and in the sub-field of DL (Doshi-Velez and Kim, 2017 ; Lipton, 2018 ; Miller, 2019 ; Aggarwal et al, 2023 ). However, current explainable AI practices can be cast as a type of model interpretability (Rahman, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the dataset was randomly divided into training (n = 37), validation (n = 5), and testing (n = 50) sets, to ensure the network was trained, validated, and tested on different participant data. Also, where applicable, the relevant checklist for good machine learning practices (GMLPs) has been considered 38 . To prepare for the SynthSR 32 method, we used the FLIRT registration method to co-register T1-w and T2-w images without resampling those to 1 mm isotropic resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%