The M121H azurin mutant in solution presents various species in equilibrium that can be detected and studied by 1 H NMR of the Cu(II) and Co(II) paramagnetic metalloderivatives. In both cases up to three species are observed in slow exchange, the proportions of which are different for the two metalloderivatives. Above pH 5 the major species displays a tetrahedral coordination in which the His 121 can be observed as a coordinated residue. Its metal site corresponds to a new type of site that is defined as a type 1.5 site. The second and third species resemble the wild type (type 1) azurin and, above pH 4.5, they are present only at a low concentration. At low pH a protonation process increases the proportion of both type 1 species at the expense of the type 1.5 species. This process, characterized by a pK a ؍ 4.3, is assigned to the protonation of His 121 . At high pH the NMR spectrum of the Co(II)-M121H azurin experiences an additional transition, which is not observed in the case of the Cu(II) protein. The dynamic properties of the M121H metal site appear to be related to changes in the coordination geometry and the strength of the axial interaction between the N ␦1 (His 121 ) and the metal.An important challenge in protein engineering is the creation or modification of metal sites in proteins (1, 2). Properties that one might wish to manipulate range from metal binding strength and metal site stability to redox potential, catalytic activity, and substrate specificity. One way to meet this task is the creation of novel metal binding sites in proteins or protein domains that in their native state have no such site (3-7). This approach depends heavily on computer-assisted modeling and automated searches for appropriate attachment sites of side chains that can act as metal ligands. The side chains must be able to attain an orientation that is favorable for strong metal binding while at the same time leaving sufficient room for possible substrate binding. The method is demanding and success is not within easy reach, but when successful the result can be spectacular (3-7).A second approach makes use of natural metalloproteins and modifies existing metal sites by applying changes in the first and second coordination shell of the metal (1, 8). The advantage of this approach is that it is relatively easy to implement and that the native site provides a solid background against which