2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterministically generated negative selection algorithm for damage detection in civil engineering systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…algorithm is based on the immune mechanism of human cells in the process of development, and the basic idea of the algorithm is to generate the detector set from the normal data set, and then use the detector to detect the state of the system or equipment [10,11].…”
Section: Negative Selection Algorithm Negative Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…algorithm is based on the immune mechanism of human cells in the process of development, and the basic idea of the algorithm is to generate the detector set from the normal data set, and then use the detector to detect the state of the system or equipment [10,11].…”
Section: Negative Selection Algorithm Negative Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the detector is generated based on GPSO, the determination of fitness function is an important step. From formula ( 6) to (10) and the GPSO, it can be seen that in the detector generation stage, the comprehensive correlation degree of the training sample set and the detector set is less than zero. The smaller the value is, the more the resultant detector belongs to the non-self set.…”
Section: Detector Generation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of SHM, damage detection can be formulated as a pattern recognition problem addressed through machine learning algorithms [51]. In many civil engineering applications, the lack of information on the system response in a condition that differs from the reference one does reduce the damage detection problem to one-class classification [7], the goal being to associate the measured features of the system to one of the two possible condition states, e.g., safe/undamaged or unsafe/damaged, by training on baseline samples belonging to the safe state only. Machine learning algorithms may require a rescaling of the analysed features to a predefined range [52], for instance to train and implement a classifier within a unitary feature space, U = [0, 1] n , where n is the number of features analysed (in the case of vibration-based damage detection, the features are derived from vibration signals).…”
Section: Vibration-based Damage Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifier is a function trained through a dataset from the reference state of the system. Among the algorithms suitable to address such problems, the authors have recently investigated the applicability of Negative Selection Algorithms (NSAs), developing a deterministic generation based version that analyses the evolution of pairs of features at the same time [7][8][9]. The feature selection strategy that will be described in Section 2 is tailored to this new version of the NSA and it is based on the pairwise correlation of structural properties between themselves and with non-structural factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, vibration-based methods have been developed for structural damage identification [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The underlying idea behind these methods comes from the fact that modal parameters are linked to physical parameters of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%