2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.105.063503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon: Perspectives with future galaxy surveys

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further understand the role of geometrical and equality information in our results, we will closely follow the rationale of Refs. [327,328], and consider additional dataset combinations not including CMB measurements. Fullshape measurements contain the imprint of two "standard rulers": the first is connected to the scale of the sound horizon at baryon drag r d , and leaves its imprint in the position of the BAO wiggles, whereas the second is connected to the horizon wave number at matter-radiation equality k eq , and governs the position of the turnaround in the power spectrum; see Sec.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further understand the role of geometrical and equality information in our results, we will closely follow the rationale of Refs. [327,328], and consider additional dataset combinations not including CMB measurements. Fullshape measurements contain the imprint of two "standard rulers": the first is connected to the scale of the sound horizon at baryon drag r d , and leaves its imprint in the position of the BAO wiggles, whereas the second is connected to the horizon wave number at matter-radiation equality k eq , and governs the position of the turnaround in the power spectrum; see Sec.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact k-reach of the perturbative treatment in particular has been the subject of an intense research activity, especially within the context of the EFT framework [12,13] (see also [26,27] for recent reviews). Even though several aspects need further developing on the "model building" front, there are already definite predictions on given observables, consisting mainly of the one-loop power spectrum and the tree-level bispectrum, that have already been employed in obtaining cosmological information from the LSS galaxy surveys [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further understand the role of geometrical and equality information in our results, we will closely follow the rationale of Refs. [318,319], and consider additional dataset combinations not including CMB measurements. Full-shape measurements contain the imprint of two "standard rulers": the first is connected to the scale of the sound horizon at baryon drag r d , and leaves its imprint in the position of the BAO wiggles, whereas the second is connected to the horizon wavenumber at matter-radiation equality k eq , and governs the position of the turnaround in the power spectrum, see Sec.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later work of Ref. [319] constructs an improved method to remove geometrical information in galaxy clustering measurements in future surveys. For the purposes of the present work however, given the precision of BOSS FS measurements, removing any external informative prior on ω b is sufficient to ensure that the sound horizon information is essentially completely (or mostly) removed, and we will therefore follow the methodology of Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%