This paper examines the suggested and implied linkages relating to the measurement of information system success as proposed by DeLone and McLean (1992), within a marketing information systems framework. Empirical support is found for some of the suggested linkages, however, others are found not to hold true. In addition, the number of suggested dimensions for information systems success are found to number only five in the case of marketing information systems, rather than the six that have been found to exist in the case of other information systems. A path diagram of marketing information systems success is developed and evaluated, and the implications of the different findings are discussed.