1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-7206(93)90037-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is frequently assumed that heavily used systems are successful (Seddon, 1997). However, as Szajna (1993) pointed out, this assumption is not necessarily correct (Seddon, 1997). The critical factor for information system success measurement is not system use, but that net benefits flow from use (Seddon, 1997).…”
Section: Perceived Market Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is frequently assumed that heavily used systems are successful (Seddon, 1997). However, as Szajna (1993) pointed out, this assumption is not necessarily correct (Seddon, 1997). The critical factor for information system success measurement is not system use, but that net benefits flow from use (Seddon, 1997).…”
Section: Perceived Market Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…system usage) measures separately from perceptual (ie. user satisfaction) measures of information system success as has been suggested by Szajna (1993) and Srinivasan (1985). Reinforcement for this opinion is also provided by a study by Conrath and Mignen ( 1990) when investigating user satisfaction and its related measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is important as earlier findings about individual system usage found conflicting evidence: it can increase performance (Doll and Torkzadeh, 1998), decrease performance (Szajna, 1993), or have no effect (Lucas and Spitler, 1999). Given individuals' usage can be organizationally ineffectual where users are dominated by the system or merely avoid important tasks, there is need to explore how advanced understanding of IS usage can contribute to designing a system wherein the outcomes serve organizational goals (Ba et al, 2001).…”
Section: System Usagementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Drawing upon Barkin and Dickson's (1977) research into use as well as the work of Szajna (1993), Dennis et al (2000), Subramani (2004) and DeLone and McLean's (1992) seminal framework, Burton- Jones and Straub (2006) define system usage as an activity with three elements: (1) a user; (2) a system; and (3) the task. They define individual system usage (use as it is called by DeLone and McLean, 1992) as an individual user employing one or more features of a system to perform a task.…”
Section: System Usagementioning
confidence: 99%