1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01810573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining concepts by group membership

Abstract: Abstract. One contribution of this paper is an efficient algorithm for deciding membership in a subgroup H of an Abelian group G when G and H are in a special form. Our approach is particularly fast because calculations are postponed until needed, and because some decisions can be made based on the existence of certain objects without actually calculating them. This mathematical problem arises naturally in machine learning, and is particularly relevant to concept modeling. We use genetic algorithms as a nontri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The example in Fig. 13, which is due to Vose [36], suffices to show that directed edge formae are also non-separable. It should be noted, however, that this second example relies on the introduction of a cycle, which is only permitted if the cycle forms the entire tour.…”
Section: Examples Of Non-separabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The example in Fig. 13, which is due to Vose [36], suffices to show that directed edge formae are also non-separable. It should be noted, however, that this second example relies on the introduction of a cycle, which is only permitted if the cycle forms the entire tour.…”
Section: Examples Of Non-separabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Suppose, however, that you understand enough about the structure of the problem that you can identify certain inherent symmetries, and certain related properties that you consider significant (so that you would wish offspring to inherit them from parents). If you can characterise these symmetries by defining a group of permutations that acts transitively on the search space, and if you can identify your important properties with the subgroup structure of this group (they correspond, if you will, to the natural "folds" in the search space-see (Vose, 1991)), then our theory applies and will tell you something about the kinds of crossover and mutation operators that can be defined on your problem. That is the subject of our previous paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%